Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th November 2006, 05:08 PM   #1
omni is offline omni  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rossford, Ohio
Default Toroidal Inductors for crossovers

I am in the process of modelling my 3 way crossover, and will be needing a few large inductors for woofer section. I recently recieved Parts Express new catalog, and they are offering Toroidal C Coils. Does anyone here have any experience with these, or information about them ? What are the upsides, or downsides to them. How do they compare to iron cores, performance wise, distortion wise, etc. Any information you all may have to share is greatly appreciated................Thank You.........Omni
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2006, 10:08 PM   #2
RJ is offline RJ  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I bought a pair of 4.7's to try out on my 2.5 MTMWW's.
They're nice and heavy for one thing, another might be less heat and less hysterisis loss than iron cores.
I went for less heat production.
I would notice air cores and some iron cores getting warm and even hot during loud sessions on my speakers. These C-cores never even warmed up.

A site on core types;
http://www.butlerwinding.com/core-ty...dex.html#ccore
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2006, 05:03 AM   #3
omni is offline omni  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rossford, Ohio
RJ Thanks for your input and the link. I read a lot of it and must admit much of it was "Greek to me", however it does suggest an improved performance with these type inductors. What are the dimensions of the coil you bought? How did you mount them? Also, I have read debates on wiring the leads to + or - on the driver to the inside wire or outside wire of the inductor.{I think it was a thread on this forum}...........Is there a specific wiring direction you took with these inductors?....................Respectfully........ ....Omni
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 02:52 AM   #4
RJ is offline RJ  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally posted by omni
RJ Thanks for your input and the link. I read a lot of it and must admit much of it was "Greek to me", however it does suggest an improved performance with these type inductors. What are the dimensions of the coil you bought? How did you mount them? Also, I have read debates on wiring the leads to + or - on the driver to the inside wire or outside wire of the inductor.{I think it was a thread on this forum}...........Is there a specific wiring direction you took with these inductors?....................Respectfully........ ....Omni

They're about the same size as an edible donut.
I mounted them on perf board with plastic wire ties.
I never worried about polarity on inductors. I think orientation is more important so there is no cross magnetization.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 06:55 AM   #5
Shaun is offline Shaun  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Orientation is less of an issue with doughnut-shaped inductors, as there is little flux leakage. The series resistance should be quite low, resulting in less power loss (the heating referred to above). Inductor polarity does not matter, unless you're trying to use the electromagnetic coupling effect with another inductor (effectively making a transformer). But this application has no use in passive loudspeaker filters.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 06:58 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Send a message via MSN to noodle_snacks
Quote:
Originally posted by RJ



They're about the same size as an edible donut.
I mounted them on perf board with plastic wire ties.
I never worried about polarity on inductors. I think orientation is more important so there is no cross magnetization.

polarity???? why even consider worrying about this? speakers are AC devices...
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 02:26 PM   #7
omni is offline omni  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rossford, Ohio
Shaun, you mention that this application has no use in passive loudspeaker filters.........Can you explain ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 02:34 PM   #8
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
Parts express also has some O cores from Jantzen, they have less effect on components beside them. I've used Duelund O cores, and they were okay for BSC in a full range, these should be quite good for low frequencies.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2006, 06:04 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stamford VT
Send a message via AIM to Jim85IROC
Quote:
Originally posted by omni
Shaun, you mention that this application has no use in passive loudspeaker filters.........Can you explain ?

He's referring to the "electromagnetic coupling effect" which is what is used in transformers to change AC voltages. This is is a completely different application than an audio filter network in which there is no desired coupling effect between inductors, and they are specifically oriented to minimize this effect. Because of that, the polarity of the inductor is of no concern in these filters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2006, 06:29 AM   #10
Shaun is offline Shaun  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Quote:
Originally posted by omni
Shaun, you mention that this application has no use in passive loudspeaker filters.........Can you explain ?
Well, transformers have been used in loudspeakers before (usually autotransformers) for impedance matching, and sometimes for attentuation. But it is poor practise (rather arbitrary) to use two separate inductors to achieve coupling, as the coupling will be very weak, with minimal power transfer. It is this arrangement that is of little use in passive crossovers: usually one tries to overcome any power losses, rather than introduce them (except, of course when attenuating a tweeter or mid).
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shielded or Toroidal Inductors for Class D output filter speakerguy79 Class D 24 10th February 2009 10:33 PM
choosing inductors for crossovers ark Multi-Way 12 9th March 2007 11:10 AM
big vs Small inductors in loudspeakers crossovers qguy Multi-Way 2 26th October 2006 02:22 AM
Whats the purpose of inductors in circuits (not crossovers) Hybrid fourdoor Parts 4 11th April 2004 12:13 AM
Ferrite Core Inductors for Crossovers r_s_dhar Multi-Way 25 29th June 2002 05:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Page generated in 0.11975 seconds (82.37% PHP - 17.63% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio