|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
At the moment I am considering building a pair of boxes approx 110cm x 50cm x 40cm with an 8 inch driver at one end of the 40 cm x 110cm face. Does it make very much difference where the port is located? The most convenient place for me would be either on the 40cm x 50cm side adjacent to the driver or on the front right next to it. The box is to be laying on it's side so it would be 110cm wide, 40cm high, 50cm deep.
Actually, seeing the driver and port output are in phase at resonance, how would it be if the driver was encircled by 4 to 6 small ports so that the two sound sources were concentric? Worthwile?
__________________
Best-ever T/S parameter spreadsheet. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tml#post353269 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 5280'
|
There is too much air resistance with multiple small ports. It's best to use a single large port
__________________
Cult of the Infinitely Baffled (Resource for IB sub builders) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
try the onken-style
1 big port is easiest, but not the only way. IMHO, Q-factor of 1 big port is high, so one get's more spectacular result but in a much narower frequency-spectrum compared to onken or different tuned pipes with the same resulting airflow resistance than 1 big pipe. Compare it to the sound of 1 big exhaust pipe for a car, or multiple ones. on this site is a onken calculator http://www.mhsoft.nl/SQL7/ViewDownloadFiles.asp |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
...so that anyone that hasn't seen it might be able to tell me about port location...
__________________
Best-ever T/S parameter spreadsheet. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tml#post353269 |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
It's a tweaky answer I'm afraid...
Port position is not normally a problem, because at the wavelengths involved, a port would have to be metres away from the driver to affect the response. But depending on you cabinet/driver/port/stuffing interactions, sometimes placing a port on the side or rear of a box will reduce out of band and turbulence noises, simply because they are not firing towards you. So it's the old "build a test box and try it" answer, sorry As for multiple ports all tuned the same, I personally have never heard any difference other than more port noise. Unless you stagger tune the ports, which I don't think is simulatable( new word?
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KT88 Minimum Mounting Distance | Rob11966 | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 22nd October 2007 12:44 AM |
| Minimum Port Diameter | Narcisse91 | Subwoofers | 13 | 22nd March 2006 07:31 AM |
| How important is minimum port diameter? | downward_dog | Multi-Way | 1 | 28th February 2005 05:44 PM |
| Distance of port to back wall? | mitch808 | Multi-Way | 9 | 10th June 2004 07:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07900 seconds (72.02% PHP - 27.98% MySQL) with 10 queries |