|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
|
Quote:
Of course, Shin, you haven't heard my line source BG dipoles w/wo multieq, so attitude??? Since I've spent extensive time with passive efforts to improve room acoustics, perhaps I don't need multi $$$$ computer active digital manipulation to achieve audio nirvana... ![]() John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
![]() The junk built in to the receivers is girly EQ though. If your impressed with that, then things can only get better eh?
__________________
The more you know who you are and what you want, the less things will ever be the same. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
|
One man's junk is another man's treasure...
Size does matter in acoustics... I'm only trying to impress my girlie, so I guess this is all the eq. I need... John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Audyssey is great for non-resonant rooms. I lost the link, but Ethan Winer of RealTraps did a writeup where he debunks their claim of lowering the ringing in a room. It doesn't. Hence why they even say that the room has have a good RT60 time before using the Audyssey system.
As an installer (regular wire guy, not an "Audyssey" installer), I find that people love this system. It makes an audible difference and its best benefit is that it intelligently averages over several spots so that it doesn't just fix the sweet spot and leave peaks and nulls for everyone else. That all being said, it's not a magic bullet. I was considering getting a standalone for my system, but it's just not worth the cost ($2k+). However, if the receiver or preamp you get has it installed, by all means, use it. My research into it now has me looking at the Behrninger DCX2496 crossover -- since it has Xover, delay, gain, and parametric EQ. The setup will more difficult, but in the end I think I can get a better result. Besides, the DIY is most of the fun
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Quote:
What's the best? Acourate with Console and an FIR convolution engine? |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
__________________
The more you know who you are and what you want, the less things will ever be the same. |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Wasn't trying to be funny, its the truth. For the rest of us there's DRC or better yet physical treatments and a bit low end DRC.
__________________
The more you know who you are and what you want, the less things will ever be the same. |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
|
Quote:
Acourate = $500.00 Computer = $750.00 minimum for older pentium class with associated sound card <=WAG ??? hrs spent screwing around with software, etc. Looks like an interesting project... don't have time to do this. I continue to be surprised at the sonic improvements I've achieved with the audyssy app included in my Denon receiver. Sure it has limitations, but with extended listening, I can clearly hear room mode suppresion vs. non-corrected listening, plus inner details are further enhanced over what was already an excellent sounding system. Each instrument in even marginally recorded material is revealed to maximum effect. My personal experience thus far would indicate one should work first to minimize room - speaker problems as much as possible, then apply room eq. as an enhancement. I doubt it's the panacea that so much marketing hype indicates, but I have experienced a noticeable improvement perceptually (as have several untrained listeners who spontaneously offered their views), with typical comments of "I've never heard low notes like that"... "..it sounds like a live concert" etc. Of course, ymmv John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
|
For the hardware? You could do it for $600 I think. For the software? Well... Console is ~$100, Acourate is ~$500 (ridiculous if you ask me), and there are some free FIR convolution engines (not sure which Shin uses). You also need a measurement mic and preamp, so, ~$50 for the ECM8000 and ~$50 for some small preamp. Of course this is with a bare minimum soundcard, you could drop as much as $2000 on just that if you like. Maybe the whole budget shooting match for $1400 shipped?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Free Digital Room Correction And PC based Xover | kipman725 | Multi-Way | 3 | 7th August 2009 12:13 PM |
| Digital Room Correction and Foobar2000 Convolve | mr.duck | Digital Line Level | 1 | 23rd June 2009 04:49 PM |
| DIY DSP for Digital Room Correction | OzOnE_2k3 | Digital Source | 114 | 17th June 2008 08:25 PM |
| I need help with digital Room-correction | Radian | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th February 2007 07:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |