|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
Woo hoo!
After a long break from DIY audio in favor of the more lucrative field of car audio sub enclosure building (sufficiently pleased with my 871s towers), I have decided that it's that time in every young man's life to do the thing. In my case, that thing is attempting to replicate my favorite speaker to date: The Definitive BP7001SC. It's their 2nd to highest end dipole design with their typical built in subwoofer. However, I have no desire to incorporate a sub into the tower as when I auditioned the speakers some time ago, I just turned the gain all the way down anyway. Now, it's time. First off, the things that I need 100% help on: Drivers: What sort of cones would be suitable for this speaker? I happen to have four HiVi D6Gs laying around from a previous project that I'd like to use. Unfortunately, they are absolutely hideous, and don't go well with any decor. Is there something that I should look for in the t/s that should give me a clue as to whether or not it will be a good candidate? I've also had bounds of luck with the Dayton 6.5" classic woofer, and buying for or even 8 of them would be cheaper than buying four more HiVi's. Cabinet: I'm fully aware as to what a dipole is, however, I'm unsure as to how to design one. Could I use two regular bass reflex enclosures opposed to eachother within the same cabinet, or would that just be counter productive? This is the part I need the most help with. Arrangement: Hamlet once said, "To D'Appolito, or not to D'Appolito, that is the question." Would a MTM for this design be superior to a TMM, or even a TM, or would it not be noticeable in my case? Again, any help would be greatly appreciated. I expect this project to take at least until my birthday (finishing included, turn 18 on 2/11), if I can start over thanksgiving break. Glad to be back on the site! -Dave |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
Bump.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Re your last question, a properly done MTM will tend to have a narrower vertical dispersion than an MT or TM. That will definitely sound different; whether or not you like that sound (I do) is a matter of personal preference. I don't know what the Definitive is, but if it's got the sound you like, configure it the same way.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
Just a typo?? Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
I've got a pair of the huge BPX surrounds and they're well good for the money I paid. I'm sure the larger floorstanders are equally as impressive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
Quote:
LOL @ bump You expected a response? You might get more entertaining discussion on the car audio forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
And it appears those real answers aren't flowing too well
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
|
Okay, I said "F it" to the D6G's for a few reasons:
1. They're hideous 2. They're incredibly expensive to have to buy ANOTHER four 3. They're hideous Now, I'm looking at these drivers and I made a design using both: http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...75-070&scqty=4 http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...95-305&scqty=8 The drivers are cheap, sound good, and they fit the criteria for this endeavor: to replicate the sound of the speakers for a fraction of the cost. It doesn't tell you much, but here's the design I made up. Circles are full diameter. The rolloff is decent with the design as sealed, but when I tune it to 50hz with a round port, the extension is lower, but the rolloff is like a cliff. I WOULD be worried, but my subwoofer should be stretching and waking up to do its job right around 50-60hz anyway. Okay, enough talk, onto the pics: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I want them to be black anyway, so here's what I was wanting it to look like in the end: ![]() Here's some rough dimensions: ![]() ![]() What I still need help with the most is the size of each chamber. As it stands right now, each side is around 1 cubic foot for each set of mids and tweets. I do not plan to put the tweeter in its own chamber like I have done before because it would separate the mids and would give each a different amount of Vb. Anyway, help me out! -Dave |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Back to Back transformers and safety ground | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 9th February 2009 10:10 PM |
| (Attn Planet 10!) active xo & 2.5 way back to back Vifa P13 mids - questions | paulspencer | Multi-Way | 9 | 15th August 2004 05:34 AM |
| Back to Back Polarized Electro's | EchoWars | Solid State | 11 | 15th November 2003 09:30 PM |
| pot feels broken but measures ok? | travis | Parts | 3 | 12th May 2003 06:46 PM |
| Back to Back input diodes | Kevin McCready | Solid State | 0 | 9th September 2002 11:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12846 seconds (80.97% PHP - 19.03% MySQL) with 10 queries |