|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hello!
Im currently building John Krutke L18-27BFC/G monitors (1st proyect). I used 1" thick MDF on cabinet construction. Zaphs original cabinet is constructed out of 3/4" thick MDF. "The port was made up of several Parts Express 260-402. It's a flared 1.6" port which seems kind of small, but I took 4 of them and cut each one to 2.2", then taped them together for a 4.4" total length" Since im using thicker MDF for the back panel, the internal port lenght will decrease... Should i increase the total port lenght by 1/4" (remember im using 1" instead of 3/4" MDF for the back panel). Or should i just keep the original 4,4" total length? In other words, is the internal port lenght what matters, or only the total port lenght regardless if its inside or not? Thank you!!!! Best Regards |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
|
Hi there,
I'm not familiar with the two designs you mentioned in your post, but will comment based on the following criteria: - you kept the internal volume the same as the original design despite using a thicker baffle - you are in fact using a flared port and mounting it on the outside of the baffle Based on this, you should keep the length the same. On a lighter note, 1/4" difference in port length does not make a whole lot of difference. Mark Ha! Leadbelly beat me to it.
__________________
Breaking speed records - http://www.mach5audio.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
Pipe length can be adjusted to fit the room-acoustics better, mostly differences become audible when they're about 1" or more... Generally a longer pipe decreases output + lowers deepest freq. and shortening it increases output + hightens deepest freq. Adjust at will!
__________________
Max. cone displacement can be several foot on any speaker!Too bad it can be done only once......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Ok, thank you! Im sticking with the 4,4" length then...
Regards! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Do you mean i should decrease total cabinet internal volume by: (pi)*radius^2*(1/4)" ????? "Since total internal volume will be increasing if i mantain 4.4" and use a thicker cabinet, if you consider the port tube volume is "stealing internal volume".... Thank you guys |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
In order of importance if you want to produce the same response as in the original design:
Keep the shape and size of the air plug inside the port the same. Keep the baffle shape the same. Keep the volume of air inside the box the same. If you use thicker MDF this probably means that you should make the box slightly deeper. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flex hose as port in vented cabinet ? | Jan Dupont | Subwoofers | 19 | 27th March 2007 03:53 PM |
| Slot port. Using cabinet walls. How to correct? Help! | tarnationsauce | Subwoofers | 3 | 22nd July 2005 08:53 PM |
| Port lenght VS baffle and air pressure | Guss | Multi-Way | 4 | 5th February 2004 10:46 PM |
| Reflex port under the cabinet ?? | gary f | Multi-Way | 21 | 26th October 2003 10:17 PM |
| port lenght for subwoofer ?? | hilbren | Subwoofers | 8 | 5th July 2003 08:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10782 seconds (77.17% PHP - 22.83% MySQL) with 10 queries |