|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: krusevac city in central serbia
|
I am about to build speaker with scan speak drivers:21w8555-01,
18w8545 and 99000 revelator tweeter.I am in doubt which xo layout is better,2.5 way or 3way for given drivers. Speaker will be acoustic suspension. Deki. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
2.5 ways are best suited to identical bass drivers. Different units will sound different at the frequency overlap
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was kinda wondering this too ... will either deliver (in general) benefits in certain areas? If I had to guess I'd say a 3 way would potentially be more detailed and clean in the midrange, but that the 2.5 way would have more bass volume and impact.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
As you state it depends on the given drivers as to which would be best. Attached is a series 2.5way for Scanspeak drivers, see source. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
I found the 2.5 way was effective when using smaller drivers like the CSS WR125's.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
Related...I think:
I was wondering about doing a 2.5 way where the .5 was ported and the other (same driver) was sealed. What major issues are there here? I see phase (~60deg) and a peak at F3 in group delay...anything else? Regards, Aaron Edit: the phase shift and group delay were specific to my model on RS125's using Zaph's measurements.
__________________
Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
'2.5 ways are best suited to identical bass drivers' - probably depends how low you cross them over; I'm currently using a 2.5 way with 5"Peerless mid-bass & oddball 8" bass units, crossed over at around 120Hz - I'm very happy with them.
5" & 8" units in separate cabs, both ported; the 8" units are EBS alignment (because they're both different units - cabs tuned differently to get same response). I'm going to try blocking the ports on the 5" cabs & add an extra cap in the xover to see how they sound, but with a touch of bass boost at the amp, this system sounds really solid & clear - love it... Cheers, Pete McK |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Separate cabs usually involves LP bandpass filter effect on the mid and even without knowing the enclosure volumes involved I would imagine that frequency overlap between drivers is relatively narrow. Wouldn't such a configuration be considered a 3-way rather than a 2.5?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
I guess it ultimately is a 3-way with similar drivers. As I do not see any objections, I suppose the silence after the questions is actually saying "Try it!"
Regards, Aaron
__________________
Regards, Aaron |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3way Horn | CLS | Multi-Way | 4 | 25th June 2008 01:20 AM |
| 3way design | Paulus1981 | Multi-Way | 1 | 20th October 2007 09:40 PM |
| 3way with bandpass sub | tinitus | Multi-Way | 29 | 9th August 2007 03:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10712 seconds (70.23% PHP - 29.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |