|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Hi!
Is it possible to split to 4 sections a TML tube? I know it is possible with a chainsaw Driver Sd 132 cm2 and the tubes and the ports would be 4x33cm2?? Greets: Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
I learnt that the TML terminus or port must be equal to the driver's Sd.
So, my question is: should I split the terminus-port to 2 or even to 4 sections?? Maybe it is better to show an example. Something similar to my question, but it has only 2 sections. Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
Yes, though the old rule-of-thumb of the terminus be = Sd isn't 'cast in stone' since it was derived back when drivers had a very large Vas. Today's generally lower Vas drivers work better with 1/4-1/2 Sd. A single large terminus is more efficient and the TML's length is the shortest for a given Fp than with multiple smaller ones. Note too that the smaller pipes will be more resonant due to their higher cutoff, but more resistive, so all things considered, some folks prefer the one over the other, like a single large vent BR Vs an Onken's multiple smaller vents. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Thanks GM!!
I thought that it has some relationship to the BR multipled vents. What do you think, how could I simulate-calculate the multipled TML ports? Greets: Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
O.K.!
I was playing with some BR simulations and I saw the lenght difference between 1 and 4 vents (or ducts) was very small. Only a couple of centimeters. Maybe it is also true for the TMLs. Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
If you design the TL as if it were only one cross-sectional area with a specific length, then you should get basically the same result if you take that area and split it into four equal parallel pipes of the same length. If you make the pipes different lengths, you will have a mess and a very difficult design problem. Depending on how you arrange the four parallel pipes, you could get exactly the same response, or only a slight difference, due to the open end boundary conditions associated with the open end areas and how close they are to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Hi Martin!
Thank you very much my Master!!!! Quote:
Greets: Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
Don't have a program that sims a response using multiple vents, only calc the difference in length, but I do know that a single big vent BR sounds different than multiple small vents that sum to the same area and Fb, though damping can null the latter's more resonant sound, so I prefer to use a single big one and skip the extra woodworking. WRT your TL layout though, a tube within a tube is a good plan for ease of bracing, so dividing it into four for the second half is what I would do. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Thanks GM!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS tube tuner, Active filter kit, tube amp, amp3 | Josephjcole | Swap Meet | 9 | 20th July 2007 04:05 PM |
| SS or tube voltage amplifying stages in an amp with tube output? | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 4th July 2007 03:09 AM |
| Octal tube as headphone amp output tube | yagoolar | Headphone Systems | 6 | 25th November 2006 09:11 PM |
| need diy tube preamp (line-stage) recommendation and general tube advice | Musiclover4 | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 24th November 2005 01:19 AM |
| tube driving the same tube - whats the collective word? | zobsky | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 13th June 2005 06:47 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11219 seconds (77.72% PHP - 22.28% MySQL) with 11 queries |