|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi,
I'm hoping to get some input/help. I'm trying to construct a crossover for a D'appolitto construction, this is what I've got so far: Tweeter: (@ 4500Hz and up) (XT25 filter: Sens 91,1 dB) Seriel capasitor: L1 6,25uF Parallel Coil: C1 0.2mH Network 1: + ---L1-----+--+ | | C1 XT25 - | | -----------+--+ Bas/Mr: (@2250Hz) (2xTC14 in parrallel, each has it's own filter: Sens 87dB) B/MR filter 1: Serial capasitor: L2 12,5 uF Parallel coil: C2 0,4mH + ---C2----+---+ | | L2 TC14 - | | ----------+---+ B/MR filter 2: Serial capasitor: L3 12,5 uF Parallel spole: C3 0,4mH + ---C3----+---+ | | L3 TC14 - | | ----------+---+ Please feel free to give me som feedback Btw. in a normal "1 XT 25 tweeter and 1 TC14 bass/mr" i would have to lower the tweeter about 4dB, but since i'm using 2 TC14 I guess they will boost the output by 6dB, therefore no Attenuation Circuit. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
*Bump*
Not any comments at all? I really could use some help here. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Hi Henrik
I don't know enough about those drivers to judge if what you're doing is right. However, current best practise is to work off acoustic measurements of the setup as it stands. Your approach will get you in the ballpark, perhaps. Measurements will show if there is an SPL mismatch between the tweeter and mid/bass drivers. You'll also be able to see how much baffle step compensation to dial in, and the diffractive effect of the driver layout and baffle dimensions. I suggest using Speaker Workshop (measurement mic required), which is free, or the tools available at The FRD Consortium (do search). Your approach to designing your loudspeaker is really the hard way to do it. It can be done, and has been done in the past, but these days it does not make sense, considering how cheap a home measurement and simulation system is currently. Consider that for a true D'Appolito alignment, which has requirements over and above the driver configuration, not only must the roll-off rate be correct, but the relative acoustic offset also has to be compensated for. This is difficult to do without measurements. Good luck.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Shaun, thank you wery much! I will certanly use Speaker Workshop. I now see that I have started the wrong way, must build a box first
/henrik |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why no D'Appolito? | diesel_88 | Multi-Way | 7 | 14th July 2008 06:58 AM |
| d'appolito | pamaz | Multi-Way | 5 | 20th June 2005 08:21 AM |
| d'Appolito configuration | somakmaitra | Multi-Way | 29 | 4th May 2004 11:45 AM |
| D'Appolito impedance | Gagler | Multi-Way | 0 | 5th April 2002 04:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08636 seconds (75.10% PHP - 24.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |