|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
after quite a few different design ideas (firstly a ported bookshelf w/ help from madisound) i think i have finally arrived at a design i want to build.
i wanted to use a single sheet of 3/4" mdf so that limited the size and shape, but i think (hope) i arrived at pretty good compromise also, how much tweeking must be done to use the crossovers originally designed for the ported box in the new set-up? please let me know what you think. drivers...... pl18wo-04 d27tg35 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i have tried to model this using mjk's worksheets, but i dont know how to save the graphs to post them,
and i am not quite convinced i modeled them correctly anyway. so if anyone could model it or tell me how to post them it'd be appreciated. and i am working on drawing up the crossover so hopefully someone can take a look and see if it is ok. thanks |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
|
You can copy/paste your plots in Mathcad into another program, even MS Paint will work. Then you can save the graphs as .JPEG etc.
Jeff |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I would expect the original xo frequency to be high enough that the cabinet design would not affect it. Most of the effect of the cabinet design would be in the low bass, although there might be a secondary effect depending on whether the original xo was designed with a baffle step, and if you've changed the cabinet width or tweeter position on the faceplate.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
the origional crossover is below, i think bsc was taken into consideration, but i dont know for sure. if it was designed in, is it appropriate for an 8" baffle?
also, could someone tell me the approx crossover point and slopes. i am working on the mjk sims so hopefully i can get them up shortly. thanks |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
here is the mjk simulation done using the old(free) offset version
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
|
I've used the D27 for some years. very nice..
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
ok, can someone tell me if the first crossover i posted looks correct, or if the one below looks better............
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Quote:
As for the PL18, in my personal experience it's an excellent driver. Pricey for a Vifa but it's in a different league than other Vifas and considering its quality it's a good value. Chinese made drivers of similar quality don't sell for much less, when they aren't more expensive. This is just my personal opinion, based on my own listening. The PL line is quite new and I haven't seen any thorough reviews of those drivers yet. I sure would like to. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
please disregard the second crossover i posted,
I beleive the first one is correct and is a second order 12db slope with an L-pad on the tweeter and a Zobel circuit on the woofer. Is this correct? any help would be greatly appreciated |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vifa speakers: 2-xt25 4-pl18 | Bryan G. | Swap Meet | 14 | 2nd November 2008 04:06 PM |
| Must sell vifa PL18 $20 Vifa pl tweeters $30 | colwaiting | Swap Meet | 0 | 20th March 2008 03:53 PM |
| New VIFA (pl18 + xt25) project | mrWagner | Multi-Way | 7 | 3rd April 2007 12:26 PM |
| Two Vifa PL18 drivers in 45 liters box OK? | andy2 | Multi-Way | 13 | 8th September 2006 04:26 AM |
| Any one used Vifa PL18 225/8 version? | JC Fardo | Multi-Way | 11 | 27th May 2003 02:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.27939 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 10 queries |