|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Hi,
I'm going to build a set of 3-way 'Hi-Fi' speakers. So far, my initial favourites for woofer and mid drivers ideally require sealed and vented enclosures, respectively. I probably do need a 'proper' enclosure for the mid to get the low-mid range that I want with the small size of driver that I'd like. There's lots of info on sealed vs vented enclosures in the forum, but what I'm actually interested in is: how important it is to be consistent between mid and bass enclosure types? I'm no expert in this field and so I may not fully understand affects such as phasing and delay in such a combination of enclosures. Can anyone help? cheers kevin |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Hi, Kevin
Venting a midrange driver is going to give you more problems than it's worth. Pipe resonances and enclosure resonances are difficult to dampen, and when it's done, you'll probably end up with aperiodic loading (actually not bad in itself) which defeats the purpose of the vent. Also, although a vented enclosure will theoretically extend the low end, right there where it starts to drop off is where you'll have poor group delay. It will be difficult to integrate into the system. Rather choose a driver that has natural low extension, or add a mid-bass driver, or use a woofer that extends up high enough to integrate easily with the mid. Actually, if the mid needs extra boost on the low end to meet the fall-off of the woofer, then your size jump is probably too big. See here http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Design_criteria.htm
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Great, thanks very much for the advice Shaun.
I was already a little concerned about a vented mid, as it was a fairly small enclosure and the tollerences would have to be tight to get it right, so what you say reinforces my misgivings. I think you've hit it with the driver size too: I normally like small mid drivers for their high frequency performance (particularly off axis), but as my main intention this time is to have a nice wide mid-range band between the crossover points a larger mid-range driver would probably be a better/safer way of getting the lower end of the range than fiddling around with challenging boxes. Thanks - you've helped clarify things, cheers Kevin |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peerless HDS Exclusive - consistency | check | Multi-Way | 6 | 17th July 2008 11:44 AM |
| OS-CON types | Glenn2 | Digital Source | 2 | 13th May 2007 12:07 PM |
| Tweeter unit consistency? | clm811 | Multi-Way | 3 | 19th March 2007 12:22 AM |
| For you EE types, please help | JMB | Digital Source | 5 | 1st July 2005 07:27 PM |
| For you EE types, help please? | JMB | Multi-Way | 0 | 30th June 2005 10:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09671 seconds (71.90% PHP - 28.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |