|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
I have made a filter proposal based on Active Filter Four for my 4way project. You can see it here .
Enclosure: H-frame for woofer 42 cm deep, 35cm wide. Midwoofer, mid and tweeter baffle 35 cm wide with a few cm foldback. I see some possible problems. 1) Overall gain caused by high levels of dipole roll-off EQ together with low Q drivers and input buffer gain. I am scared of interstage clipping, overloading PA's inputs and DC level on filter outputs. Maybe it is not an issue, but it seems me a lot. 2) With tweeter's filter exception there are BP filters at the "beggining" of chain. Unfortunatelly I hasn't found a better topology. 3) I don't know if the additioning of All-pass filters is clever idea, because the delay falls with frequency and tweeter delay could become as a problem. Isn't a better idea to leave woofer - midwoofer XO unequalized? Circa 15 cm difference in at 100Hz is only 5% phase shift. Can you tell me your opinions? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
Methman,
I didnīt know that dipole design can be made that complex. But I still donīt see the notch filter for the H baffle quarter wave resonance. Why do you set a ShLPF 25-330Hz Dipole rolloff EQ, if you are low passing LR4 at 100Hz? So your woofer out 36 dB gain is much lower in reality - I guess about 14 dB less IMHO.
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
Sorry it is not clearly visible - EQ2 (board1) stage is used for H-frame quaterwave resonance supression.
ShHPF I set this way: Fequal is around 140Hz for 42 cm H-frame and dipole gives 6dB gain above Fequal against monopole. That is why I've set dipole rolloff EQ to "twice" the Fequal to ensure flatness of the response in the xo region above 100Hz XO. Am I wrong? When you take a look at Phoenix there is a 10-300LP in woofer's branch - this led me think as I'm thinking. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Praha
|
Hundreds of AFF boards sold and no one met those problems?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active filter for bass dipole | felixx | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th December 2006 12:05 PM |
| Theoretical Design - Current Feed Active Dipole Speaker | ThorstenL | Multi-Way | 34 | 2nd November 2006 08:01 PM |
| FS: 3 Way Active Dipole Crossover PCB and Parts | transducer | Swap Meet | 0 | 20th December 2005 10:02 PM |
| active filter from rod elliot and sub filter questions | wuffer | Parts | 0 | 2nd October 2005 01:12 PM |
| Need amp recs for active dipole speaker project | goskers | Solid State | 3 | 3rd June 2003 03:36 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08529 seconds (72.50% PHP - 27.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |