|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi
I am considering building an Ekta using all Scan-Speak drivers. see http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Ekta.htm. Does anyone have any experience of this relatively new design? Has anyone heard it? TIA. Michael |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Ekta.htm
link works. No real comments except the tweeter alternatives sound sensible. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
yup, built them, love them.
swaped the tweeter for a 9500 though. had a pair of jbl 4311's, replaced them with his sp95's, then went on to the modified ektas. Troels was of great help, still have all the info about xover changes etc. for more info see here --> http://www.chriscrystalcraft.com.au/N.S.E.W.htm need to add in the xover schematics, but if you look at the pics of the crossover you should be able to work it out real easy. Bass section is unchanged. minor mod to mid and tweeter section. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
|
Wow love your speaker build- that IS overkill!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Ocaukrell
Thanks for your reply. Good job with your Ektas, they look great. I already have the R2904/70000s, so I can't go for the sensible tweeter option. My previous project was a two way monitor with a 15W/4531. They sound a bit thin and cold in the midrange - perhaps a similar problem as in your 95 project? They sound great with some music and pretty dull with others. I am changing the mid/bass inductor from 1.6mH to 1.8mH as suggested by the designer to try and cure this. I have set my heart on building some Ektas though; unless I can be persuaded otherwise. How do yours sound with different stlyes of music? I listen to a varied selection of female jazz, pop, folk, rock and dance. I am looking for an equisite, but warm and music friendly sound (musical???). Michael |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Red Oak, IA
|
I second the request for a review of the 9500 Ekta. I'm building this or the Galtis, but I like the idea of a 4" covering midrange more than I do a 7".
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mlankton
Do you have details of the galtis (a link perhaps). TIA. Michael |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Tktran -
yes little bit overkill in some ways. With what the mids cost (even at trade it hurts) I new that I had one chance to do this, if I turned around to the other half and said "I just want to change this bit" I dont think I'd be here today !! overall the final cost to me was about $2,200 from memory. Considering I've seen similar systems retailing for $10,000 +. And I haven't heard anything under $8,000 that comes close. The cabinets I really wanted right. If you look at the sp95's on my page even though I thought they were braced enough, in use under moderate volume (normal conversation can still be had in the room) you could feel slight vibrations in the panels, hence the use of 1" and further bracing. It works too, rapping them is like trying to break your knukles, no vibration at all. dublin - EDIT- to answer your Q. exactly what I was after, smooth and detailed, easy to listen to but still able to suprise with depth, and thats what I got. I prefer paper drivers, if there done right I think they are just that bit warmer and more listenable than hard metal cones. -- No worries, the sp95's are fantastic, dont get me wrong, they will destroy almost any comercial speaker I've experienced this side of Au$3,000. But for me who can tell if something is right or not, they were just lacking that little bit. when set up next to the old jbl 4311's, even though the SP's are so much nicer, the missing midrange is glaringly obvious. And if it aint right then I wont be happy. As for music styles, I've tried with things like telarc 1812, kate bush, pink floyd, norah jones (wish I could find a good recording of her), paul simon, roger waters, enya. reminds me, must get that bork cd of a freind and really tourture them. All I can say is, it's just as well I live in a brick house with a reasonable space to the neighbours. with the sp95's, they sound best if your sitting there facing them. with the ektas, it doesnt matter if your facing them at all. the mid just adds that final piece of the jigsaw. Very happy camper here, think these will last me a looooong time. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
|
Quote:
By raw objective data, the 8531G has potential to be a superb midbass AND midrange driver. However this requires a crossover that deals with both the poor off-axis response at 3Khz and adjacent 3.2Khz resonance. I have followed the development of the 7" floorstander concept pursued by Troels, from the ProAc Response 2.5 clone, to ProAc "2.95" to SP95, SP38/13 and then Ekta. The Ekta benefits from continued R&D, particularly the re-worked cabinet and port tuning, and crossing well below 2Khz. I'm not surprised it sounds fantastic! Glad you like it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
In regards to refining of crossover, I can't say whether this is a possible cause or not.
But I do remember Troels talking in depth about cabinet choice for the bass driver (sp38/13 pdf ??) From memory he states that if the 18w8531g00 is placed in a smaller enclosure it turns into more of a midrange driver. But he prefered the sound of it in slightly larger bass cabinet. I have heard it as such and I agree with him. So for me at least, I'm putting the 'missing' midrange (sp95) as being more a function of the cabinet being optimised for bass rather than outright midrange. Too be honest, I don't believe your average listener (what 70% of 'them'?) would notice. These people are probably more than happy with their pioneer and sony multi channel budget amps. The SP95 really is an exceptional speaker. It just does so many things right. Lets not forget that it's trying to get a 7" to mate with a 1". Thats a big ask for any driver. The Ekta on the other hand is less of a compromise. Not to mention another almost %40 of the cost of the SP's again. If we were honest (and filthy rich) we'd probably go and buy either some B&W 801's or electrostatics. With the sp95 I use cheap caps and inductors with 18mm mdf. In the Ekta I've used Mundorf (std) caps and one huge bass inductor with heavily braced 25mm material. (not quite mdf) At the end of the day, any 'kit' speaker is only going to be as good as how it's copied. (design not withstanding) Then there's the final test of a speakers 'quality' or abilities. What YOUR ears like to hear......... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scan-Speak 3-way design (Ekta Grande modified) | pjpoes | Multi-Way | 12 | 6th July 2009 09:29 AM |
| scan-speak 3-way | dre73 | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th November 2005 01:05 AM |
| New vs. old Scan Speak? | Mr Ekan | Multi-Way | 1 | 5th April 2004 09:50 AM |
| Scan-speak M1 (again..) | macgyver | Multi-Way | 0 | 31st October 2002 08:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11933 seconds (81.32% PHP - 18.68% MySQL) with 10 queries |