|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
Presently I have two projects underway, but am looking to plan the next venture.
Looking around, many of the intriguing designs (Cyburgs, BIB, and THOR) are a little bit beyond where I would like to go. Cyburgs Needle is a little limited on SPL. BIB's end up...well, big. THOR is just too expensive for my budget. But, I do have a pair of Dayton RS125S and a Peerless DX tweeter. Combined, it could make a nice low profile MTM setup at 8ohms. Budget is a concern as well as size. Tall and slender would be the better move. My ultimate question: Would someone be interested in helping me to design a TL with the MTM configuration above? Something like a THOR...but, on a fiscal and physical diet. I have read through much of the t-linespeakers "dummies" section. However I do not have MathCad or the CAD (and associated skills) to do design work. I am also open to a BIB based on the MTM idea. Any help on the planning stages of this would be greatly appreciated. According to Zaph's site, the RS125 measures: Fs = 76 Hz Vas = 2.15 l Qts = 0.5211 Qms = 2.8941 Qes = 0.6355 Xmax = 2.8 mm Sd = 51.53 cm^2 Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
Thanks for the point. Still $25 for the sheets...he's right though, it's probably worth it. Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
IMO Fs is simply too high to bother with a TL. Specs indicate it would make a nice sealed MTM or 2.5 way TMM for use with a subwoofer, or two for an active bass 3-way. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
Sreten...back to the X.5 again? Seems a theme in your advice to me
As for the RS125's, I had also considered a bipole as Planet 10's WR/FR125 bipole. Based on Zaph's measurements, I could possibly cross at ~100 and use a side firing 10" sub for the lower register. In that case, would I fire in or out...or would that depend on the room? I've read other threads preferring an MT or MMT over an MTM configuration due to various issues. Any thoughts there? Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
You don't mention sensitivity which at 83dB/w is crippling for a MT. A MTM or TMM after BSC is going to be around 83/84dB/W. Which side for side firing ? no idea - but doesn't matter as you can simply swap left and right speakers arounds in room. Mid 50's for a 84db/W TL ?, pathetic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
Quote:
Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore, Maryland
|
What abour a 2.5 system where the tweeter is sealed, the mid is sealed, and the 0.5 driver (same as the mid driver) is in a ported enclosure? The idea being to get the nice transients in the mids, but extend the bass an octave while also beating baffle step.
I seem to recall seeing similar, but I can not remember if it was two of the same drivers or two different drivers. Based on models, it looks like there would be a spike in group delay near F3 of the ported encolsure. Also, it seems about a 60deg phase shift would need to be corrected. Regards, Aaron
__________________
Regards, Aaron |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
A 2.5 MTM BIB looks like a fun project based on PE's measured specs. Post a request on the BIB thread. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peerless XXLS vs. Dayton Reference vs. Dayton Titanic MKIII ? | wigginjs | Multi-Way | 6 | 3rd March 2008 08:56 PM |
| Vifa/Dayton/Dayton... First speaker for me, finally! | alexcd | Multi-Way | 6 | 29th November 2006 10:54 PM |
| Dayton DA aluminum cone woofer + Dayton DC28f tweeter | springy101 | Multi-Way | 7 | 15th March 2006 05:22 PM |
| Dayton 6" reference and dayton silk dome tweeter combo project...input? | nerd of nerds | Multi-Way | 4 | 2nd December 2004 05:36 PM |
| Dayton 5.25" AL vs. Dayton 5.25 paper for Lo-Mid opinions? | netgeek | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th May 2004 01:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11199 seconds (78.99% PHP - 21.01% MySQL) with 10 queries |