|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hillsborough, NC/McLean, VA
|
That is the question...
I need a pair of speakers for the room where my computer's in, so I can listen to some tunes while doing work. Having a great system in the living room doesn't help me much for that. I'm thinking about going with dual Adire Extremii per channel, and I have a pair of Dayton silk domes I'm going to use...the choice is between: http://www.adireaudio.com/Home/KIT261.htm for the regular "boxed" design or: http://www.adireaudio.com/Home/KITDDR.htm for the dipoles. I'm going to substitute the silks for the Neo3's if I go with the DDR's (unless someone tells me it's a horrible idea that'll sound like sonic poop). Power is not an issue, they're going to be driven by a Crown rack amp. What would the dipoles offer that the ported enclosures wouldn't? I know I'd be giving up really low bass extension, but what do they have on their side...i.e, why should they be worthy of considering other than the really easy "enclosure" build. Thanks in advance!
__________________
Jim J. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think you really have to hear a dipole for yourself.
The lack of box colorations and the reduced room interactions was an absolute revelation for me. While I have never heard those particular speakers, I am using the NEO3 in my OB and its a remarkably good tweeter. Good Luck. Doug |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
It much depends on where you are going to place the dipoles. If they are next to your computer desk (nearfield), most of their virtues will not shine. If they serve as loudspeakers for the complete room you certainly should try it. Doug is definitely right in what he is saying.
Changing from the NEOs to dome tweeters will change the upper frequency range from dipole to monopole. While you should be aware of this, I don´t see much of a problem in it. You certainly will have to adjust the X-over. Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
You will still get greatly reduced colouration, and that is worth it. In reference to mono vs di on the tweeter(w/ dipole woofer) Linkwitz designed a speaker with a monopole tweeter and di- woofer and stated that going to a dipole arangement on the tweeter would not provide any benefit(not a quote ). So no hard and fast rule there, go whichever route you want.Also, I have the neo8 and the neo3 and they are both awesome. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dipole Ribbon tweeter isolation from dipole mid-woofer array | Bent | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 21st May 2009 12:10 PM |
| dipole or not? | maghen | Multi-Way | 21 | 26th May 2008 11:38 AM |
| (WW) MMTMM dipole – 4 vs 3 way / dipole benefit frequencies? | charliemouse | Multi-Way | 25 | 7th July 2007 11:19 PM |
| Dipole Sub in car?can I? | mikee55 | Subwoofers | 9 | 2nd January 2006 04:06 PM |
| When is a dipole not a dipole anymore? | Bas Horneman | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th December 2003 03:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09441 seconds (72.34% PHP - 27.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |