Single or stereo speaker evaluation - Page 3 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th August 2006, 09:35 AM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
Do you want a pair of M1 used ?

In Italy no one hi-fi shop want permutate it. My "poor" friend
is desperate !

Cheers,
Inertial
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2006, 10:23 AM   #22
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
No big bipoles for me, sorry. They image soft and big when in synergistic spaces but not true in my opinion. Small bipoles are a different story.

Back to our main theme. More people that have been evaluating their speaker prototypes in single and stereo and what they find the most proper method in the long term and why.

Until now we seem to find that in mono its easier for getting it right and stereo to adjust the 3D element for most of the participants. More contributions are welcome.

If we design a speaker for HT or professional use and numerous non predefined positions what would be the preferable method?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2006, 07:25 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas NV
Yea i've found that when listening in stereo it tends to mask some of the problems. If a speaker I thought was terribly bright just by itself, when i move to stereo it doesn't seem nearly as bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th August 2006, 10:13 PM   #24
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Hmmm dont forget that the pair losens mutual coupling the higher you go in frequency (hence mid to low is stronger) and that the reverberation of the room is heavier in stereo. So you listen to more power response profile. So stereo is for stereo and can be masking. I have had the experience of fine tuning for stereo, and having good results in similar rooms. When fine adjusting in mono, I had more consistent results in many rooms. Did you meet such evidence too?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single 6N6P stereo pre-amp Brit01 Tubes / Valves 41 19th November 2011 04:50 AM
Can single PCM56P act as stereo? terranigma Digital Source 1 27th February 2007 10:29 PM
Stereo Single 4780 traw Chip Amps 3 16th February 2006 12:39 PM
speaker design and evaluation equipment - what are my basic needs? k98luka Multi-Way 7 30th January 2004 02:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2