|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Notch filter to flatten frequentie respons or impedance of speakers can be serial or parallel.
Parallel: L C and R parallel in serial witch the driver Serial: L C and R in serial and parallel over the driver I've seen crossover networks with both of them but what is the reason to prefer a serial version over a parallel one or a parallel over a serial? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Queensland
|
One issue is the series resistence. You might want to keep passive components out of the signal path and this would possibly increase signal purity and lower the insertion loss of the network. IE allow a little mor power to the driver.
__________________
"It was the Spring time of the year when aunt calls to aunt like mastodons across the frozen waste." P.G. Wodehouse. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Jonathan thanks for posting.
So you say that a notch filter in the signal path is not so good because you have more components and loses, before the signal gets into the driver. But why don't everybody uses serial notch filter then in parallel with the drivers? There are many many crossover filters with the components of the notch filter in the signal path. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
If I want to deal with a cone breakup hump above a woofers crossover frequency, I like to use a parallel notch filter. The parallel filter needs the series impedance (which the main crossover inductor is providing) or else it wont work.
If the notch filter is the only crossover part on the driver, a series will have to do otherwise (for a parallel to work) you'd need to add a series resistor to take the energy within the filter band. All this is very generalised. I find filters are situation specific but I tend to prefer the parallel where possible. One reason might be that the drivers seem an easier impedance target to work with than the entire crossed over segment (if you look at where the respective filter's effects lie) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Indm's usage is in conflict with how the original poster defined series/parallel.
The main difference is in whether or not you can tolerate a rise in impedance (parallel notch) or a dip in impedance (series notch) The parallel filter will also have an insertion loss below the filter frequency due to the inductor DCR.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Thanks Ron E, to clarify I refered to the parallel notch filter as the series string of components together placed in parallel with the driver, and the series notch filter as the parallel(ed) components together placed in series with the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
So, as I understand:
A serie notch filter in parallel with the driver is used for cone breakup. Cone breakup is mostly in the take-over region between woofer and tweeter. Both must be in phase. Is there no risk that the signals are not in phase anymore after inserting the notch filter? A parallel notch filter (with components of the notch filter in parallel) is used in the passband of the crossover filter. Am I right? I still don't see the reason why a parallel notch filter is better in the passband of the crossover? Can a serial notch not do the work.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
On my bass I use series notch ABOVE passband to adjust coherence with mid/tweet
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are you able to sim the crossover? |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
One more question:
Why is a serial notch filter always used refered to the negative to remove bumps? Is it not possible to use a serial notch filter to remove dips in the frequency when the filter is refered to the positive amplifier point. I mean one side of the filter on the speaker + and one side on the amplifier + to remove dips in FR. At resonance frequentie of the notch impedance is zero and the speaker gets more energy from the amplifier to remove the dip in FR.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| electronic crossover and a NOTCH Filter | mitchyz250f | Multi-Way | 4 | 1st May 2009 11:39 PM |
| Serial or parallel | K-amps | Solid State | 19 | 12th November 2006 01:58 PM |
| Contradicting Parallel Notch Filter from Various Sites. | ]|[ GorE | Full Range | 3 | 11th March 2005 03:48 AM |
| parallel notch filter help | kan3 | Multi-Way | 2 | 23rd January 2004 03:20 AM |
| Notch filter for crossover-good idea? | kelticwizard | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st September 2002 04:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11963 seconds (80.87% PHP - 19.13% MySQL) with 10 queries |