Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Capacitorless line-level XO?
Capacitorless line-level XO?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th August 2006, 02:35 PM   #1
Nixie is offline Nixie  Canada
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Default Capacitorless line-level XO?

Looking at US patent 6115475, they show a capacitorless crossover. I'm wondering if this is doable for a line level XO instead, and more specifically one that would be transient perfect and have at least 2nd order roloff (http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/CrossoverdocN.html). So basically can one do Kreskov's design, but without using capacitors?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2006, 11:05 AM   #2
annex666 is offline annex666  England
diyAudio Member
annex666's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: England
I've looked briefly at the proposed design and it seems to be more of a focus on the "perfect" transient response of the filter, rather than a design free of capacitors.

It is perfectly feasable to produce a capacitorless line-level crossover - there are two ways this can be done:

1) The use of inductors as the frequency-dependant component.

2) The use of the opamp open loop dominant pole to create a closed-loop transfer function that is desired (this is a bit of a cheat as it isn't capacitorless - just that it relies on the internal capacitance that produces the dominant pole). This is more of a trial and error approach as the dominant pole is variable from device to device (and even from sample to sample of the same device) and is therefore not ideal for audio work.

I'm wondering why you would want to create a capacitorless crossover? The usual trend is to remove all dependance on inductors and create a design based entirely on capacitance - this removes the many problems inherant with inductors, namely their large size/weight, high cost, poor tolerances, saturation problems (with cored inductors) and RF pickup.

With correct circuit application almost all instances where an inductor is used can be replaced by either a passive or active capacitor-based circuit.
...if it ain't broke don't fix it - make it BETTER!
  Reply With Quote


Capacitorless line-level XO?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convert Line Level to Electric Guitar Level miallen Instruments and Amps 4 16th May 2010 02:22 PM
Speaker level to line level converters qguy Subwoofers 2 9th December 2007 04:58 PM
speaker level input vs line level question crippledchicken Subwoofers 4 17th July 2007 04:36 AM
lesser of two evils, high level -> line level, digital volume control mazurek Solid State 3 19th November 2006 01:25 AM
how to bring down line level signal to preamplifier level deji Solid State 15 15th April 2004 05:13 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio