Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th July 2006, 03:05 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
Default B&W 602 S3 mods

Hi

I am now the happy owner of a pair of modified 602 S3 and thought it might be useful to share my experience. There are two things I have done:

1. Stabilized the cabinets. As it can be seen in the picture, I added two "ribs" on the lateral walls just aside the woofer and a piece of hard wood that links the back, front and the original middle reinforcement of the cabinet. The front is build like a low resonance sandwich of wood, plastic (filled with mica, according to B&W) and the aluminium chassis of the woofer, but I backed the plasic with some self-adhesive bitum tape to further reduce resonance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cutie1s.jpg (91.0 KB, 1022 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 03:16 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
2) Actually THE modification: I removed the plastic dustcap of the woofer and installed phase plugs !

The plugs are made of wood, I tried to keep the shape of the dustcap (it resembles the phase plug of the B&W 700 and 800 series). THere are a few aspects that must be considered when performing the operation:

- I wouldnt try to remove the cap by pulling it in any way, because it it firmly glued to the Kevlar cone. Instead, I have cut it with a cutter (and attention) just at its base, leaving a plastic ring glued on the cone.

- the plugs can be gluet to the pole piece without problems.

- the voice coil has 4 holes in it, just behid the spider, that serve to eliminate compression behind the dust cap. With the dustcap removed, these holes are now openings between the interior and the exterior of the cabinets, which is not goot. Make sure you cover them (I used adhesive paper tape, for protection by paining), they make a HUGE difference.

That's it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg difcuplugs.jpg (90.5 KB, 958 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 03:18 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
The speaker with the dust cap removed:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg diffaracaps.jpg (94.9 KB, 923 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 03:20 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
The holes in the voice coils behind the spider that should be covered:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg gauris.jpg (22.9 KB, 949 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 03:26 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
Phase plugs made of wood (the inner diameter of the voice coil is ~3cm, make sure you leave about 1mm space between voice coil and plug)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg plugss.jpg (86.8 KB, 892 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 03:30 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
I will come back soon with a few words on the sound. To me , it was all worth the effort, especially the phase plugging is spectacular. A link on phase plugs (and beyond):

http://www.mother-of-tone.com/speaker.htm
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006, 07:45 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
Now, as I promised, a few words on technical background and sound experience.

First, why a phase plug ? For a mid-woofer it is only efective if it radiates relatively high frequencies. This obviously apply for the 602s, since the declared crossover point is 4kHz and the low pass filter is first order, which means that the woofer radiates well above 4kHz !

Now, the results:

I started with a mistake: I left the speaker in the previous arrangement, that is, strongly toed in. Very wrong. With a phase plug, the directivity of the speaker is changed to a great extent. Although a difference could be heard, I found the sound dull. Then , after a few measurements with a SPL-meter (I'll come to that later) it occured to me: I should experiment with different orientation. The difference was huge ! As I progressively oriented the speakers only a bit toed in, not only the soudstage was at a level that I never experienced before, but the tonal balance was back ! Phase plug speakers are MUCH more sensitive to positioning than dust caps, it seems.

I must say again, the difference is spectacular. First, the mids are much more coherent, natural and better defined. I realized that - as pointed out by others too - the harsh sound of the 602 is NOT due to the metallic tweeter, but to the mid-woofer. That I expected.
What I neither expected nor can explain is a spectacular gain in bass bodyness and definition - maybe this is because low frequencies are not masked by "mid-noise" anymoore.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 01:24 AM   #8
Salas is online now Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Its very probable you created a dip in the power response. Hence the new 3D and bass. Fine since you like it.
If the dustcap was particularly irritating in its aid to maximize mid output, maybe your 'wrong' is better than B&W's 'wrong'.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 02:21 AM   #9
jleaman is offline jleaman  Belgium
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Send a message via AIM to jleaman
WOW! Good work.. I bet you were scared tho when you were cutting tho ..


Jase
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006, 05:57 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
Quote:
Originally posted by salas
Its very probable you created a dip in the power response. Hence the new 3D and bass. Fine since you like it.
If the dustcap was particularly irritating in its aid to maximize mid output, maybe your 'wrong' is better than B&W's 'wrong'.
I honestly don't think so, although I also cannot be 100% sure by now.
I have done some (pseudo-)measurements that showed that there should not be any massive response dip on the woofer. Because I don't have a proper measurement system yet, I had to use a hand held analogue SPL meter - which seemed quite sensitive though !

Of course, I also don't have an anechoic room, but it is well damped and I placed the speakers in the middle and such as to minimize reverberation.

I have measured the midwoofer section(with first order LPF) from approx. 50 cm in the range 1-5kHz. The response showed close to linear up to 3500 Hz(within 1-1.5dB), then it fell slowly - something one can expect from a first order LPF (B&W declares a 4kHz crossover point, at which the woofer was still at -1 dB or so). The off axis response was fairly constant (within 1dB) up to 30 degrees.

I have also measured the entire box. While there are some (small) amplitude variations arround the crossover point, they might either have been there before too, or due to the room influence.

Please note that I don't claim accurate mesurements - they are far from it. But they did show that there are no huge problems (like 5dB dips) and actually do suggest that the woofer still does its job well - this is also confirmed by the sound: the mids are not recessed, but lively. But ff there is a slight dip, one could correct it by reducing the value of the inductor in series with the woofer. I also remarked that it might be just silly to try have an ultra linear anechoic response , since a quick measurement from my listening place with the speakers on their stands, showed a pretty chaotic response - which however let itself improve by orienting the speakers in a different way.

A last theoretical note: a phase plug should also extend the frequency range of a speaker, by eliminating cancelations at the higher frequency radiated by the central part of the speaker. So, what you give up by removin a cheap plastic resonant dust cap, you might gain back with the phase plug. This should be particularly true for the B&W kevlar speakers, because they are purposely designed with a non-stiff membran such that, as the frequency increases, only the central part of it radiates (something like a controlled cone breakup).

I hope to be able to come up with more accurate measurements, I would appreciate any hints and advices in this respect.



Quote:
Originally posted by jleaman
WOW! Good work.. I bet you were scared tho when you were cutting tho ..
Jase
I was only scared of what I might find inside
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nad's mods Calamaro Solid State 8 13th July 2008 02:23 PM
ns-10 mods nvinyl66 Pass Labs 42 17th February 2006 01:21 PM
What are Mods? pinkmouse Everything Else 4 4th November 2004 12:33 PM
cdp mods - Help! Sparhawk Digital Source 2 3rd October 2002 09:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Page generated in 0.11690 seconds (80.96% PHP - 19.04% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio