|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Hi
I am now the happy owner of a pair of modified 602 S3 and thought it might be useful to share my experience. There are two things I have done: 1. Stabilized the cabinets. As it can be seen in the picture, I added two "ribs" on the lateral walls just aside the woofer and a piece of hard wood that links the back, front and the original middle reinforcement of the cabinet. The front is build like a low resonance sandwich of wood, plastic (filled with mica, according to B&W) and the aluminium chassis of the woofer, but I backed the plasic with some self-adhesive bitum tape to further reduce resonance. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
2) Actually THE modification: I removed the plastic dustcap of the woofer and installed phase plugs !
The plugs are made of wood, I tried to keep the shape of the dustcap (it resembles the phase plug of the B&W 700 and 800 series). THere are a few aspects that must be considered when performing the operation: - I wouldnt try to remove the cap by pulling it in any way, because it it firmly glued to the Kevlar cone. Instead, I have cut it with a cutter (and attention) just at its base, leaving a plastic ring glued on the cone. - the plugs can be gluet to the pole piece without problems. - the voice coil has 4 holes in it, just behid the spider, that serve to eliminate compression behind the dust cap. With the dustcap removed, these holes are now openings between the interior and the exterior of the cabinets, which is not goot. Make sure you cover them (I used adhesive paper tape, for protection by paining), they make a HUGE difference. That's it. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
The speaker with the dust cap removed:
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
The holes in the voice coils behind the spider that should be covered:
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Phase plugs made of wood (the inner diameter of the voice coil is ~3cm, make sure you leave about 1mm space between voice coil and plug)
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
I will come back soon with a few words on the sound. To me , it was all worth the effort, especially the phase plugging is spectacular. A link on phase plugs (and beyond):
http://www.mother-of-tone.com/speaker.htm |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Now, as I promised, a few words on technical background and sound experience.
First, why a phase plug ? For a mid-woofer it is only efective if it radiates relatively high frequencies. This obviously apply for the 602s, since the declared crossover point is 4kHz and the low pass filter is first order, which means that the woofer radiates well above 4kHz ! Now, the results: I started with a mistake: I left the speaker in the previous arrangement, that is, strongly toed in. Very wrong. With a phase plug, the directivity of the speaker is changed to a great extent. Although a difference could be heard, I found the sound dull. Then , after a few measurements with a SPL-meter (I'll come to that later) it occured to me: I should experiment with different orientation. The difference was huge ! As I progressively oriented the speakers only a bit toed in, not only the soudstage was at a level that I never experienced before, but the tonal balance was back ! Phase plug speakers are MUCH more sensitive to positioning than dust caps, it seems. I must say again, the difference is spectacular. First, the mids are much more coherent, natural and better defined. I realized that - as pointed out by others too - the harsh sound of the 602 is NOT due to the metallic tweeter, but to the mid-woofer. That I expected. What I neither expected nor can explain is a spectacular gain in bass bodyness and definition - maybe this is because low frequencies are not masked by "mid-noise" anymoore. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
Its very probable you created a dip in the power response. Hence the new 3D and bass. Fine since you like it.
If the dustcap was particularly irritating in its aid to maximize mid output, maybe your 'wrong' is better than B&W's 'wrong'. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
WOW! Good work.. I bet you were scared tho when you were cutting tho
Jase |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Quote:
I have done some (pseudo-)measurements that showed that there should not be any massive response dip on the woofer. Because I don't have a proper measurement system yet, I had to use a hand held analogue SPL meter - which seemed quite sensitive though ! Of course, I also don't have an anechoic room, but it is well damped and I placed the speakers in the middle and such as to minimize reverberation. I have measured the midwoofer section(with first order LPF) from approx. 50 cm in the range 1-5kHz. The response showed close to linear up to 3500 Hz(within 1-1.5dB), then it fell slowly - something one can expect from a first order LPF (B&W declares a 4kHz crossover point, at which the woofer was still at -1 dB or so). The off axis response was fairly constant (within 1dB) up to 30 degrees. I have also measured the entire box. While there are some (small) amplitude variations arround the crossover point, they might either have been there before too, or due to the room influence. Please note that I don't claim accurate mesurements - they are far from it. But they did show that there are no huge problems (like 5dB dips) and actually do suggest that the woofer still does its job well - this is also confirmed by the sound: the mids are not recessed, but lively. But ff there is a slight dip, one could correct it by reducing the value of the inductor in series with the woofer. I also remarked that it might be just silly to try have an ultra linear anechoic response , since a quick measurement from my listening place with the speakers on their stands, showed a pretty chaotic response - which however let itself improve by orienting the speakers in a different way. A last theoretical note: a phase plug should also extend the frequency range of a speaker, by eliminating cancelations at the higher frequency radiated by the central part of the speaker. So, what you give up by removin a cheap plastic resonant dust cap, you might gain back with the phase plug. This should be particularly true for the B&W kevlar speakers, because they are purposely designed with a non-stiff membran such that, as the frequency increases, only the central part of it radiates (something like a controlled cone breakup). I hope to be able to come up with more accurate measurements, I would appreciate any hints and advices in this respect. Quote:
|
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nad's mods | Calamaro | Solid State | 8 | 13th July 2008 02:23 PM |
| ns-10 mods | nvinyl66 | Pass Labs | 42 | 17th February 2006 01:21 PM |
| What are Mods? | pinkmouse | Everything Else | 4 | 4th November 2004 12:33 PM |
| cdp mods - Help! | Sparhawk | Digital Source | 2 | 3rd October 2002 09:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11690 seconds (80.96% PHP - 19.04% MySQL) with 11 queries |