|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Hi
I believe a few guys here are building this, and so am I. My drivers and the better crossover parts (Goertz 14 AWG foil, Solen caps, Eagle films - all the series components) are reaching me early next week or today, so I shold start briefing woodworkers early next week. A few Qs on cabinets, stands and ports, would be great if someone helps me out here. Thanks in Advance. 1. Box volume: How tolerant is the design to small changes in internal volume? Since the woodworking is local (shipping to India is killing) and my brief to the woodworker will be to use corner and front to back bracing above woofer, which will probably kill a bit of internal volume. I will increase the dimensions to compensate, but may go slightly off - how big of a problem is it? 2. Stuffing and damping: I don't have Sonic Barrier, Whispermat etc. available, so will be using local substitutes, someone help me with making a choice: a. Car carpet (difficult to get but can try) b. Generic yellow bedding foam c. Recron - the Indian substitute to Dacron d. Coir 3. Ports: I may not be able to get the exact port tube of 1.6" internal width. In which case I will need to plug the box dimensions to the closest I know, along with the T/S (I'll be using Zaph's average of two units, not manufacturer specs as I can't measure them myself) into WinISD to get a port length to find the length I'll need to tune the box to the 42 Hz required. Is this acceptable as a procedure? Staying on ports, what would be a minimum acceptable width? I thought 1" would be way too small, and 3" too wide. Is there some way to determine port width WRT box/woofer size or air velocity? 4. Cabinet material: I will probably be using plywood and not MDF (easier to get). The stuff varies greatly in quality, so I'll have to figure a way to get good quality board. I may have to use 1" ply throughout, buying just one 4/8 sheet. Apart from increasing all external dimension by half an inch, anything else to watch out for? Like what glues, type of joints etc. should be used? 5. Stands: The application is for nearfield monitoring from my DAW at my home studio. I was thinking of buying a couple of inexpensive barstools and setting them up for the time being, and later figure out how to make the stands. Which is where I need the most help. I have no idea on how to make a good stand. Any pointers, link would help, as I have never used standmounts before. I was thinking sand-filled PVC pipe with MDF platforms on top and bottom (absorbent), or a complete cast iron structure spiked to the floor (transmittive), or a combination (MDF platforms/cast iron rods or Cast iron plates/sand-filled pipe)... Which way to go? Boy, this is surely my last try to get things from USA by courier. The delivery is quick, but $200 is what you should be prepared to spend, over and above the cost. $80 shipping, $120 tax. This thing had better be beating some high-dollar designs, which I am pretty sure it will do.Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Hi
The title may be misleading, I'm looking for any help at all, and not, as the title would suggest, only from Zaph. So guys, help a noob out, please. TIA. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
I don't see anyone helping you, so I'll just put out a few quick answers.
1. Not too critical but be sure to err on the larger side. Also be willing and able to adjust the port length to maintain tuning. 2. It's difficult to judge the consistency and effectiveness of any of those items. Dacron can work, but due to it's fluffy consistency, it's difficult to arrange in a vented enclosure so that the middle of the cabinet can remain open. If you can get it in denser sheet format that would be fine. Otherwise, consider 1/2" carpet padding, doubled up to 1" thick on all internal sides. This stuff is also variable in consistency. Your best bet is to search out items with proven acoustic properties from vendors who supply that type of thing. Good luck. 3. If you are not using a flared port, use roughly 50mm inside diamater and calculate a new length using WinISD. Anything much larger than that will not fit in the box, and anything smaller than that without a flare will have turbulence noise. 4. Plywood is fine, as long as it's void-free. Leave it to your woodworker for figuring out the corner types. 5. Stand construction is not critical. The issue bigger than mass, damping, coupling and all that is tip-over stability and speaker location. These need to be out from the walls a bit and the tweeters need to be at ear level. You mention these are for near field listening, however I hope they are still at least a meter away from your ears. Anything closer than that will make them sound a little on the warm side, along with some integration and imaging issues. These are not nearfield speakers by design, but should work fine at least a meter away. Quote:
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
You say the application is nearfield monitoring, the design as is is not suitable. Quote:
Dense padding (carpet type) etc... up to 1cm thick works best as the first layer lining a wall, but its optional. To get vented boxes working well the box walls should be lined with open cell foam 2cm to 3cm thick. In the tall thin box types you can add dacron / BAF/Polyfill or similar to the airspace that is well way from the port. There are two schools of thought with stands. Lightwieght and rigid and massive and rigid. Either works well IMO, I'd go all steel and simply copy a manafacturers product. http://www.millennium-music.co.uk/ho...36&mode=detail Is a nearfield stand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||||||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Hi Zaph, sreten,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That comment was directed at the frustration of paying almost double the original unit prices to get the units into the country. It had nothing to do with the design and whether the design was worth it. I know you're probably not around to read this, but FWIW I really enjoy reading your pages, I think your designs are fantastic, and you're doing a great job for all of us in this little DIY community. I for one would be really disappointed if this flow of info stopped, and would kick myself comatose if I felt my misplaced comment had anything to do with it. My apologies. I don't think you quite realise how much it means to hear from you directly, Zaph, and how much more confident of my success this reply makes me. Thanks again. Quote:
Edit: Forget it, I found the crossover on one of Zaph's earlier posts, the L-pad is also different, 3.3 and 5 ohms instead of 4 and 3.3 ohms. Maybe I'll try both. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks a ton for the help! |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
I would not use closed cell foam padding for the first layer, it will reduce internal volume too much for little effect. The first layer (up to 1cm) can be dense, but not closed cell. Note that you can obviously EQ the baffle step, but building with lower BSC gives you a liitle more monitoring headroom. :0/sreten. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Hi,
I thought even the dense carpet padding would reduce the volume by a similar amount, maybe I could use a dense open-cell foam - if I can find it. Thanks, I didn't remember about EQ, as I'm a bit of a snob about it. Maybe I'll put in these inductors (almost as expensive as the tweeters!!!) for now and bundle the reduced BSC components with my next speaker purchase, as I'm beginning to feel I should've gotten that crossover to start with. Thanks sreten for your help. I look forward to a long and happy build. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
"I'll probably get someone to machine a 45-50 mm flare into the back panel and cut a tube to the length."
Ideally the end of the port inside the box would terminate with a small piece of wood so that it could be similarly flared. Not only will there be less chance of port noise, but the air will flow easier in one direction than the other, with the possibility of the driver's center position getting offset, reducing effective xmax.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Noah |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
So flared on both ends, right?
Then I'll try to do as Zaph said, get two flared ports and join them back to back. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
"So flared on both ends, right?So flared on both ends, right?"
Yes.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Noah |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| digital crossover for zaph's L18/27tbfcg | ScottTracy | Multi-Way | 9 | 13th September 2007 01:40 PM |
| Zaph L18/27TBFCG design questions | Dave Bullet | Multi-Way | 28 | 3rd September 2007 02:40 AM |
| zaph l18/27tbfcg build quesion | vcmc | Multi-Way | 17 | 8th June 2007 06:55 PM |
| Zaph's L18/27TBFCG Efficiency | Whit | Multi-Way | 1 | 13th March 2007 08:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16744 seconds (85.13% PHP - 14.87% MySQL) with 10 queries |