|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
I'm a bit confused because of the throat chamber (Vaf) calculations in Leach's horn design paper. In his example, he solves eq. 36. This gives a value of 'k' for which the maximum value of w3 occurs. Knowing this, how should I calculate the throat chamber volume?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
e-side,
Take a look at figure 3 at LOW-FREQUENCY HORN DESIGN USING THIELE/SMALL DRIVER PARAMETERS by D.B Keele, Jr. http://www.dbkeele.com/papers.htm Paper no. 11 and first decide what you want from your horn. If you want to maximize the mid band for your horn, your choice for k is 4 and Q= 0.5 for Fh(s) as in Leach example and Vf is Rho (0)*c^2*0.686*Qtc^2*Cat: Cat = Cab//(Sd^2*Cmd). Now for the choice of driver: (In Keele’s fig.3) fhm = 2*fs/Qts is important because for maximum efficiency, fhm gives the upper highest possible cut off. But if you want to trade efficiency for more bandwidth for an unknown reason, then another Q for Fh(s) must be chosen and you have to decide a new upper corner closer to fhvc or fhc. This results in that you cannot use Q=0,5 for Fh(s) and you have to step back to eq. 34 (Leach) and consider a new value for Caf. For fhvc you must pay attention for your driver’s voice coil inductance and for fhc you must decide the size for Vf. Or the easy way...get Hornresp and start fiddle with tedious simulations using known good drivers for the right purpose! B |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Wilds Of Canada
|
doesn't anyone use voight anymore?
__________________
"Never forget that only dead fish swim with the stream." -- Malcolm Muggeridge. "Truth cannot be brought down, rather the individual must make the effort to ascend to it." -- Jiddu Krishnamurti |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Thank you for your answer bjorno
I experimented somewhat and came up with the following. In case of a maximum sensitivity (Qlc = 2Qtc) design, k = 4 for maximum w3. It ran a couple of calculations and it appeared that Qlc isn't always 2Qtc , so k, Caf and Vaf will change. Therefore a new value of k (to maximize w3) should be determined. In my case Qtc = 0,35 and Qlc = 0,61 This gives Ral/Rat = 1,35 and Rat/Ral = 0,74 Solving eq. 36 gives a maximum value of w3 for k = 3,48 Caf should be calculated, so we need a value for Cat. This can be done by solving eq. 25, the other variables in this equation are known (or can be calculated). For my design Cat ~ 1,3547E-8 Then Caf and Vaf can be calculated, this results in a throat chamber of 0,159 litres. regards Erwin |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bass Horn with & without a Rubber Throat | WithTarragon | Multi-Way | 1 | 22nd April 2008 02:21 PM |
| Optimal throat size = 0.5 or 0.7 Sd ? | lowtherdream | Full Range | 43 | 7th September 2007 05:20 AM |
| Where is the throat in this plan? | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 14 | 9th August 2007 07:40 PM |
| wtb: horn throat adaptors, 1.4 to 2inch | nyatt | Swap Meet | 0 | 29th June 2006 05:58 PM |
| Horn speaker w/variable throat & mouth | bbaker6212 | Multi-Way | 1 | 1st August 2003 07:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08260 seconds (75.58% PHP - 24.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |