|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ACT
|
In an isobaric configuration, can the 2nd woofer be mounted on the back of the box, like this:
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
No, that is not isobaric loading. That is two drivers in one box which will double the size of your enclosure. An isobaric design will halve the size of your enclosure.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ACT
|
Good point, in fact, that was a stupid question!
~Andrew |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
If in same polarity, your schema is called a bipole and cancels baffle step in full.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Isobaric loading question | IG81 | Multi-Way | 5 | 26th April 2009 09:46 PM |
| isobaric loading for small box vs displacement | danielm | Subwoofers | 5 | 27th May 2008 03:20 AM |
| Need Help if this setup work! | pinoy82 | Multi-Way | 3 | 6th November 2002 01:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06658 seconds (65.43% PHP - 34.57% MySQL) with 11 queries |