|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
I don't have a lot of audio experience, I like to mention.
I never heard anyone say the things so rationally and clearly and make sense like this man in audio http://www.zaphaudio.com/aboutme.html I also like his link http://www.theaudiocritic.com/downloads/article_1.pdf Although I must say I think I like fullrange speakers not only cause they have no cross-overs, but mostly because they have no crossovers Anyway, I want to build some computer speakers. I guess my main question is should I go with fullrange or 2-way, I have a sub it play from 100 Hz down. F3 is at 100 Hz and it has a 24 db/octive slope. I like the Aurasound NS3-194-8E cause it's cheap and no x-over. Maybe I can put 2 in each speaker? But it won't match my sub too well. I'm pretty close to the speakers about .8 meters, so I was thinking having the highs and mids come form one or two points (both points being "fullrange" in the case of two fullranges in a speaker) might be real important at this distance. If I can get away with it though, I'ld maybe like to build 2-way using a Dayton RS-150 or RS-125. I dont know which would be better. I'm thinking I can get the RS-125 in a smaller narrower box and I can get the middle of the driver closer to my tweeter. The tweeter would be a DAYTON DC28FS-8, I guess ?
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas NV
|
Well what is your budget. A crossover isn't neccessarily a bad thing but it can be daunting. For computer speakers a fullrange driver is fine because ussually it is directly aimed at your head.
If your going to go 2-way the DAYTON DC28FS-8 measures quite poorly and there are better tweeters out there. The center to center driver spacing is dependent on the crossover frequency. As long as your drivers' centers are below the distance of the wavelength of the crossover frequency you'd have no ill effects. Basically the closer the tweeter and woofer the better. For example the wavelength of 5khz is 2.7in. If you were going to crossover this high aslong as the center of your tweeter, to the center of your woofer's distance is less than this its fine. Although that is a rather high frequency to cross over. If you want small computer speakers that sound great those tiny audax monitors on zaph audio are great. Since you are new you'd probably want to start off with a proven design. The dayton RS woofers you mentioned are fine drivers and there probably are some designs posted out there. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
There are some things I agree with and some I don't. Lots of technology makes sense, it's how much effort put into realizing it and how much effort is put into sales that gives people different impressions, thus taking a stand regardless of the actual merits of the implementation.
For desktop computer speakers, I would go with full range simply because one is sitting within the distance of normal driver measurement range. So you will get enough sound pressure with very small power.
__________________
Hear the real thing! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
http://www.zaphaudio.com/audio-speaker20a.html
http://www.zaphaudio.com/audio-speaker20b.html Seems to me to be perfect for the job in question. Just use a more conventional cabinet. The small amount of BSC used makes them ideal for nearfield listening. If actively filtered at 100Hz, the power handling of 64W should be enough for near field listening, max combined SPL = 110dB. (80dB/W per speaker = 104dB/64W per speaker) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
Hmm . . . if I used the Aura NS3-193, I would not use a tweeter. And if I used the Aura NS3-193, I would use the Aura NS3-194
Sreten, I just built a sub using that amp you helped me with 2 + years ago Design that has 24 db/octive roll-off at 100 Hz And guess what? It has a huge peak at 30 Hz I'm better at working with electronics now, so I think I can get around this, eventually. Probably in another 2 years Oh I should post some pics! I like pics, plus you guys can laugh at my setup/system I don't know if I should post the pics here so here's the links to the pics of my sub (the first one) and my speakers. I just have a 4.7 uF cap on the tweeter and a .9 mH 12 gauge inductor on the woofer. I like the open baffle sound. http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...4/DSCF1198.jpg http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...4/DSCF1199.jpg http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...4/DSCF1200.jpg http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...4/DSCF1201.jpg http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...4/DSCF1202.jpg You guys like my desk?
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
I find that these are much too unknown:
http://www.altecpro.com/pdfs/E5464_R06_CF404_DS.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
I'm glad some one noticed the time and effort I put into aesthetics.
__________________
We do not allow political statements or conjecture to be made on these forums.---the diyAudio moderation team |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Quote:
Spectrumaudio sells them. I have currently no need for high quality computer speakers, but as far as I know there is no other fullranger with that Vas and T-Amp compatible sensitivity. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I just built Zaph's HiVi B3s speakers... thanks a lot, Zaph! :) | fjhuerta | Multi-Way | 21 | 23rd May 2011 10:46 PM |
| Building a High-End computer based DAC | erozsolt | Digital Source | 4 | 16th April 2010 01:52 AM |
| building a new computer speaker setup | pjpoes | Planars & Exotics | 0 | 5th November 2005 05:44 PM |
| Advice on building powered computer speakers | alphaGeek | Multi-Way | 1 | 20th September 2002 10:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11870 seconds (82.28% PHP - 17.72% MySQL) with 11 queries |