I'm engaged in a "discussion" with a rather hardheaded individual about particleboard vs. MDF for subwoofer enclosures. He stresses there are no fundamental drawbacks to using particleboard, other than the fact that it looks like *** and is difficult to finish.
I disagree, but I need some concrete numbers or facts to back the claim up...or just any applicable evidence.
Thank you in advance!
I disagree, but I need some concrete numbers or facts to back the claim up...or just any applicable evidence.
Thank you in advance!
Particle or K3 board is cheapest but weakest. Doesn't hold a screw forever and doesn't like moisture. Used it for years before MDF came along.
MDF is good sonically but doesn't like moisture and is only medium tough. Used it some.
Plywood is toughest but not as dense as MDF. Use nothing else now. IMHO easiest to work with.
I'm not sure you're going to find a concensus on this . Like Gregg says, it's up to the DIY budget.
MDF is good sonically but doesn't like moisture and is only medium tough. Used it some.
Plywood is toughest but not as dense as MDF. Use nothing else now. IMHO easiest to work with.
I'm not sure you're going to find a concensus on this . Like Gregg says, it's up to the DIY budget.
if correctly damped and braced, i don't think that particleboard is so much worse than MDF, only screw are never sufficient with particle
also i prefer to work with particle board, i really hate this MDF dust, it don't even smell wood
so for me : if you are poor : particle board
if you are rich : Plywood
i built a sealed sub out of particleboard with a SLS 12, and it is totally inert
also i prefer to work with particle board, i really hate this MDF dust, it don't even smell wood
so for me : if you are poor : particle board
if you are rich : Plywood
i built a sealed sub out of particleboard with a SLS 12, and it is totally inert
Engineering specs. for appleply and plywood:http://www.statesind.com/pdf/ApplePly.pdf Engineering specs . for chipboard: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2000/salik00a.pdf (page 5) What should be of primary concern would be the Modulus Of Elasticity. This will reflect how the materials bend and would effect cabinet construction. There is little question as to density. Lift a panel . If this is about the thread on SIN, yeah , the builder of those cheap boxes is way out of line.
Look at the following waterfallplots:
Particleboard
MDF
As you can see there is not much difference between both materials.
For people interested in the test conditions, more measurements, incluiding birch ply, meranti ply and sandwichstructures (it's in Dutch however):
http://www.zelfbouwaudio.nl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=18&Itemid=2
With kind regards Johan
Particleboard
MDF
As you can see there is not much difference between both materials.
For people interested in the test conditions, more measurements, incluiding birch ply, meranti ply and sandwichstructures (it's in Dutch however):
http://www.zelfbouwaudio.nl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=18&Itemid=2
With kind regards Johan
Concrete numbers or facts? not so sure. I think bare plywood 'sings' more than bare MDF but the plywood is easier to live with. The numbers would betray my feelings on the issue.
If you are going to carefully brace and damp the panels then the issue moves toward becoming moot.
If you are going to carefully brace and damp the panels then the issue moves toward becoming moot.
MDF, particle board and ply all come in a wide range of qualities. Take the best variety of any one, and it will outperform poor examples of the others. For example, I like using high density 'flooring grade' particle board (and yes, it does machine well with a router), but wouldn't consider the 'crumbly' stuff for serious construction of anything.
In order for numbers to work, we would need to make some assumptions. Like for example, that the only issue is how much noise the panels produce.
Decades ago, cabinets were expected to make noise, and manufacturers would put efforts towards how they would sound.
If I didn't misread, Nelson Pass suggested a preference for a 'live' cabinet. I can't find the posts in the search system just now to be sure. I think it suggests there is more than just quantity of resonance to consider. (BTW IIRC, these posts were not about subwoofers, but FWIW).
Decades ago, cabinets were expected to make noise, and manufacturers would put efforts towards how they would sound.
If I didn't misread, Nelson Pass suggested a preference for a 'live' cabinet. I can't find the posts in the search system just now to be sure. I think it suggests there is more than just quantity of resonance to consider. (BTW IIRC, these posts were not about subwoofers, but FWIW).
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- MDF vs. particleboard