|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
I have read that sound it self can be seperated in 6 different stages.
Deep bas: 16 - 35 Hz Bas: 35 - 120 Hz Low midrange: 120 - 400 Hz Midrange: 400 - 2k Hz High midrange: 2k - 5kHz Diskant (dont know the word for it in english, sorry) 5k - 20kHz Would it be a good idea to build a speaker with 6 element's and a filter that split the different ranges between the element's depending on frequenzy, or am i way out of track here?! Im new to this so laugh at me or tell me if it could be done, or maybe it allready have been? Thanks in advance, Carl Johan... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi Carl,
Interesting question. I think you'll find there are differing opinions on the frequencies you have listed and that there isn't really anything that causes a division, so they're not necessarily important figures. Often the spectrum is divided by octaves. Ideally you want one driver to cover all frequencies but that's tough to do. Some like full range drivers, other find them lacking. The next best thing is a two way. You have only two drivers to mess the sound up and one croosover point. Some persons like to start with a really good midrange and work outward from there, ie: use the mid for most of the spectrum and just fill in where needed at the lowest and highest frequencies. By the time you get to six drivers, you had better have well matched drivers and a heck of a lot of XO knowledge or they might just end up being a waste of time and money. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bellevue, WA
|
You have the right idea, it makes sense to split the work between several drivers.
Assuming you want your speaker to work between 20hz and 20khz, you would split it into: 20-200hz - subwoofer 200-2000hz - midrange 2khz-20khz - tweeter The above configuration makes sense if the speaker is passive, but once you go to active subwoofers many people choose to use a single powered subwoofer to save costs. With one sub you have to push the crossover frequency down in order to hide its location, so now your crossover points are 80 and 2000, which is pretty close to most 3 way projects. I personally would love to try a two way project with a crossover frequency of 600hz, but I can't find a good tweeter. The various full range drivers that can be crossed over this low all have low sensitivity and a relatively ragged upper response. I'll have to keep waiting for that 2" dome tweeter with an fs of 400hz, sensitivity of 90db/watt, and LE of .05mh. Dan |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Quote:
To the original poster, the frequency ranges you mention are convenient for discussion purposes, but don't really correspond to any real physical phenomena and so don't necessarily correlate to how you want to arrange your drivers. This question really has far more to do with the physical properties of the drivers than anything else. There are some perception-related effects that may govern where you choose to place your crossover frequencies, but even this is widely debated. IMHO even if you're going for true state-of-the-art full-range performance at high levels, a 3.5 or 4 way system is all that is needed: 20Hz-40Hz - subwoofer (this can be mono) 40-300 - woofer (upper end can be anywhere from 200 to 400) 300-2k - mid 2k+ tweeter (this assumes you're looking at 'conventional' speakers. Horns are a different matter, and can have more limited frequency coverage than direct-radiating drivers) |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New and stupid. | gbeard | Introductions | 2 | 28th December 2007 02:50 AM |
| This may be stupid but.. | skyraider | Digital Source | 1 | 17th December 2004 10:39 AM |
| Stupid question | red | Solid State | 8 | 23rd May 2004 09:03 PM |
| ....and now for something very stupid..... | bob4 | Everything Else | 2 | 23rd December 2002 04:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09753 seconds (75.40% PHP - 24.60% MySQL) with 10 queries |