Crossover Summed Response
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 17th April 2006, 07:22 AM #1 real   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Melbourne Crossover Summed Response Hi All, I am in the process of building some speakers, specifically in designing the crossover. I am having trouble assessing the summed response. All sources and websites I have visited so far have simply used the sum of the output voltages from each leg of the crossover - this doesn't seem right to me. Should it not be the sum of the power output from each leg of the crossover, with respect to the phase that it is output at? Assuming a resistive load (complex loads are much too complicated for this purpose), the power output will be proportional to the square of the voltage magnitude, at the voltage angle (assuming similar driver sensitivites and impedances/resistances): Output = |Vwoofer|^2 * exp(i.angle(Vwoofer)) + |Vmid|^2 * exp(i.angle(Vmid)) + |Vtweeter|^2 * exp(i.angle(Vtweeter)) I have used this formula, in conjunction with many different filter types (Bessel, Butterworth, Chebychev and others) to get a 3 way 3rd order crossover with the flattest frequency response (~ ±2dB variation). I must use at least a 2nd order crossover for the tweeter. I could not get a flat enough response with the second order crossover though. What are peoples thoughts? Thanks, regards, Chris.
 17th April 2006, 10:40 AM #2 lndm   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: nsw You are right in that it is more complex than that. You need four plots per driver to properly construct a crossover. It can be complicated but is drastically improved with a crossover simulator. You need an impedance magnitude plot and that impedance's phase plot to calculate the effect of the crossover components on the driver. The filter transfer function translates to the effect on the driver's measured acoustic frequency response plot. The driver's acoustic phase plot is required to sum multiple drivers, and to see group delay issues. All of the above can be measured with simple equipment and will take an initial investment of time.
 17th April 2006, 02:34 PM #3 sreten   R.I.P.   Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Brighton UK Hi, for what its worth Linkwitz/Riley croosovers are the only filters that theorectically sum to a flat power response, it is this that defines this filter type - which is only relevant to crossovers. I say theorectically because the response required is acoustic, not electrical, and the units also have to be time aligned. /sreten.
phase_accurate
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
 for what its worth Linkwitz/Riley croosovers are the only filters that theorectically sum to a flat power response, it is this that defines this filter type - which is only relevant to crossovers.
NO - others definitely sum flat as well.

Quote:
 I say theorectically because the response required is acoustic,
That part however is true but again not only for LR.

Regards

Charles

 17th April 2006, 06:03 PM #5 real   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Melbourne lndm, I'm not sure I have the equipment or time to measure the acoustic phase plot of my drivers! However, I do have a signal generator and oscilloscope, and I have measured the |impedance| of the drivers, and will use zobels/resonant circuits to make it flat. Sreten, I am currently looking into Linkwitz-Riley circuits, thanks for that. Charles, which others sum flat? It should be the |voltage|^2 at voltage angles which sum flat, correct? Thanks for the help, Chris. PS, is there any problem using high (3rd to 4th) order crossovers in speakers apart from cost? I have been reading that their time/transient response is not that good.
 17th April 2006, 09:35 PM #6 David Gatti   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia If you need some testing or simulations done Real, drop me line, I might be able to help you (I'm also in Melbourne). David www.gattiweb.com
 18th April 2006, 01:02 AM #7 lndm   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: nsw You'd be surprised what you can do with a cro configured for lissajous (X-Y) patterns, a frequency table on paper, a little common sense, time and determination, for measuring phase. These days I plug my mic into my soundcard and use FFT software to do it in seconds. Having spent many years designing crossovers by hand, I believe that no matter how much theory you absorb, or calcutations you make, you will virtually always need to tweak by hand/ear afterward, with an open mind.
phase_accurate
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Quote:
 Charles, which others sum flat? It should be the |voltage|^2 at voltage angles which sum flat, correct?
Third-order Butterworth for example and all crossovers that behave like:

H(s) = (1+sT+s^2*T^2+ ... + s^n*T^n)/(1+sT+s^2*T^2+ ... + s^n*T^n)

Regards

Charles

real
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
David, thanks for the offer, I will pass my design by you, see what you think. It won't be for a few weeks though as I am currently overseas! In fact, I'll just post on the forum when I get back - I have done plots on MATLAB too of the summed responses.

lndm, I am not sure what you are talking about wrt the X-Y patterns, could you explain to me please?

Quote:
 Originally posted by phase_accurate H(s) = (1+sT+s^2*T^2+ ... + s^n*T^n)/(1+sT+s^2*T^2+ ... + s^n*T^n)
Charles,

H(s) = 1 in this case! Third order butterworth is what I have designed thus far - I am mainly checking to see that I have used the right formulas for getting the summed response - since no one has said otherwise, I assume that I am correct!

Additionally, I mentioned that I did impedance measurements of the drivers, though this was in free space, no enclosure. Is this an issue? It only really affects the woofer (mid is dome type), which only needs compensation for the impedance rise at high frequencies - will this be different when in the enclosure? I will check it anyway when I have time to do all this stuff!

Thanks all,

Chris.

Svante
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
Quote:
 Originally posted by sreten Hi, for what its worth Linkwitz/Riley croosovers are the only filters that theorectically sum to a flat power response, it is this that defines this filter type - which is only relevant to crossovers.
I don't agree. Odd order filters sum up to a flat response if the branches are butterworth. The easiest case would be the first order filter, which cannot be LR (they are always even ordered):

Hlp=1/(1+s/s0)

Hhp=s/s0 / (1+s/s0)

The sum of the two is (1+s/s0)/(1+s/s0)=1
__________________
Simulate loudspeakers: Basta!
Simulate the baffle step: The Edge

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Richard Moon Multi-Way 99 15th June 2015 04:22 PM kyrie48 Multi-Way 0 4th January 2009 01:37 PM nicharis Multi-Way 3 28th January 2002 11:36 AM Rachel Solid State 2 10th January 2002 04:07 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM.