Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th April 2006, 11:59 PM   #1
mazurek is offline mazurek  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default baffle step on just midrange or whole system

I am still working out my next active crossover. I was curious whether the phase effects of the baffle step correction should be applied to the whole speaker, or just the midrange. I guess the essential question is are the phase effects equalizing the midrange phase in a good way to make the phase plot more straight, or not?

For everyone's amusement here is a plot of the gain and phase effects of a typical baffle step correction circuit.

By the way, I will continue to make divergent pcbs from the main diyaudio pcb until they start including muting relays (I'm sure after the active crossover building boom, others will wish they were included).

Lee
Attached Images
File Type: png untitled.png (19.2 KB, 168 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2006, 09:39 AM   #2
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
I can't say I believe the phase changes from the compensation circuitry are anything but a side effect. It is the level that is the reason for the baffle step compensation. As far as that, it will effect all frequencies below a certain point, no matter what driver they are coming from. Each driver may be a little different due to individual mounting conditions but not hugely.

Imagine (only), compensating each driver individually for the baffle step first, then implementing a text book crossover. In theory this would work.

Do you have a way of measuring to be sure? If not you may find a baffle simulator a helpful (necessary) toy to play with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2006, 01:39 PM   #3
mazurek is offline mazurek  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
I finally produced good measurements from my bookshelf for the first time. I had long been having trouble getting good in room measurements, but usingn the technique of pull out the system into the middle of the room and measure from 12-24 inches away gave really good results.

The whole baffle is covered in felt to deal with no flush mounting. Baffle is parts express 0.25 cubic feet, 7.5" wide.

Here is measurement of the midwoofer with no crossover.
Attached Images
File Type: png woofer.png (39.0 KB, 117 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2006, 01:40 PM   #4
mazurek is offline mazurek  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Here is a simulation of the woofer
Attached Images
File Type: png simulation.png (17.8 KB, 113 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2006, 01:48 PM   #5
mazurek is offline mazurek  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
The woofer exhibits almost perfect baffle step - -3db down from enclosure at 85, + -6db down from baffle step. Its response is slightly smoothed, but there is some noise.

Interesting comments: I used my audiophile roomate to a large part to tune with and without various options such as baffle step on the behringer deq, as I was having a lot of difficulty getting reliable measurements in my room. He liked it better without a baffle step, said it sounded more detailed. Evidently he liked midrange hump, also I think the drivers have broken in slightly since then. I myself cannot usually hear anything concrete A/B style, but have to listen over long periods of time, a nagging feeling of missing warmth led me to try to measure again. It is sort of amazing actually that both with and without bsc sound plausible, I would have expected 6db difference to be ridiculously large. Before the recent correction experiments, my roomate suggested my speakers sound like high end b&w.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2006, 01:53 PM   #6
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
Glad to see you are getting the results you want. Be aware that the baffle step does not show its strength up close. Recommended measuring distance is at least 2' but I notice that in anechoic chambers, it is more common to measure from 10'.

Your measured results look promising. You'll notice there is a steady rise from the lower midrange right to the upper limits of your midwoofer. If you use an RC across your driver to flatten the impedance and then apply an inductor in series with a rolloff centred in the lower midrange, it will (probably) flatten the woofers response, compensating the baffle step in one fell swoop.

PS. done right, this will give you the warmth you seek.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? 454Casull Multi-Way 15 19th May 2012 03:12 PM
what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? kappa546 Multi-Way 6 24th January 2006 10:21 PM
baffle Step rgrayton Full Range 33 4th December 2004 11:16 PM
Baffle Step + Sub Aural Dan Multi-Way 7 9th October 2004 08:23 PM
baffle step help. AudioGeek Multi-Way 3 10th February 2004 11:02 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Page generated in 0.08831 seconds (76.38% PHP - 23.62% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio