|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
|
Everywhere it seems to say that you're supposed to use only non-polar caps in crossovers. I have some polarized caps that match the values that I need... can I just use them instead? If so does it matter which way it's connected?
__________________
The End |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mississauga ontario canada
|
No
1. Polarized caps are not meant to see reversal of the charge applied to them. Usually they create a very low impedance...not the calculated value at the frequency of interest. 2. The tollerance of polarized caps is not good enough to be used for frequency sensistive circuits. I have used them as coupling caps in a back-to-back pair where there is very low DC potential. Low impedance forward vs low impedance reversed...Win-Win situation (still DC isolated)
__________________
Doug We are all learning...we can all help |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
YES
1) Back to polarized caps don't really care if the current is zigging or zagging. 2) The tolerance of polarized caps is suprisingly good compared to 1947. While this discussion is specifically related to their use in crossovers, in application I could detect no increase in distortion or impulse response when I examined an amplifier which used a very expensive 4.7uF polypropylene cap, or a pair of electrolytics arranged as bipolar. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
|
You can't use them.
Neither direction would be correct, because the current needs to flow both ways. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
KEF and Audio Research used them to good effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
They are OK to use back to back as someone pointed out. I usually use them in speaker zobel networks or imp correction applications. Not much used in signal flow path for high end.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
|
Wasn't contradicting you, I'm still under moderation so my post came in a little later than it was actually made.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
|
I think i'll just go out and buy some real capacitors... thanks everyone! I'm glad i didn't solder them in and wonder why the sound sucks.
mladen
__________________
The End |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| passive crossovers.... | stuman | Subwoofers | 10 | 8th December 2009 02:44 AM |
| Black Gate Standard Polarized or PK Mini Polarized = Rubicon YK or YXE | kurtbauer | Parts | 1 | 21st August 2008 06:50 AM |
| Polarized capacitors for coupling | NIC1138 | Parts | 7 | 1st June 2007 08:37 PM |
| Passive Crossovers >> Capacitors Question | Beggar | Multi-Way | 7 | 15th December 2005 03:20 AM |
| dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order | Hybrid fourdoor | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2004 09:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09019 seconds (74.83% PHP - 25.17% MySQL) with 10 queries |