|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
5th April 2006, 04:25 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
Volume sealed/ported enclosure for W18NX
Hi,
I keep coming up with a 0.5 cu. ft. (14.158 liters) enclosure for this driver. I know the W18E/EX drivers perform best in 0.777 cu. ft. (22 liters) because of designs readily written about on the web. Can someone please confirm this? I was hoping to use the same box for both the nextel and magnesium drivers. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| effects of volume in sealed enclosure? | Infinity_Addict | Car Audio | 12 | 12th June 2005 12:00 PM |
| sealed vs. ported | sonu | Multi-Way | 25 | 9th May 2005 12:50 PM |
| ported --> vented enclosure? Or just sealed? | dj.eph | Subwoofers | 3 | 20th December 2004 05:23 PM |
| Sealed or ported? | mazeroth | Subwoofers | 13 | 23rd November 2004 12:44 PM |
| Would ported or sealed enclosure be best for this driver in small PA system? | The Paulinator | Multi-Way | 26 | 25th April 2004 03:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06947 seconds (64.91% PHP - 35.09% MySQL) with 10 queries |
