|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UW Stevens Point Campus
|
Hello,
I have found a sub in my basement collection with dual voice coils. What is the effect on spl when the voice coils are put in parallel as opposed to series? thanks, Opie |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
|
Opie, the efficiency of the driver will be unchanged with either connection, but the sensitivity will be different.
Suppose each coil is four ohms, and driven from a voltage source providing 2volts. With the coils in parallel, each will draw a current of 2/4=0.5 amps. If the product of flux density and coil length (Bl) is say 5 for each coil, then the force produced is F=Bli x2= 2.5 x 2 =5 Now wire them in series. Each will now only have 1volt across the coil, so the current in each coil is now only 1/4=0.25 amps. The total force is now 5 x .25 x 2 = 2.5. The force on the cone is now one half that of the parallel connection, so the output is 6dB down, though the impedance is 8ohms rather than 2ohms. Andrew |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opposing voice coils? | JCoffey | Subwoofers | 2 | 6th November 2008 02:54 PM |
| corroding voice coils | pdan | Full Range | 15 | 30th August 2007 01:11 PM |
| Voice coils - too many, all must go. | Toddy Audio | Swap Meet | 3 | 31st December 2003 03:46 AM |
| Dual voice coils | Opie | Multi-Way | 1 | 19th December 2002 04:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07083 seconds (63.97% PHP - 36.03% MySQL) with 10 queries |