|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere near Enschede
|
Hi all,
I've been reading some threads about open baffled speakers and now I can no longer control the urge to design and build one myself. I'm thinking of a 2.5 design on an open baffle with two 5" midbass units and a tweeter. One midbass will be crossed at appr. 4500Hz to the tweeter with a first order series crossover (I've heard plenty of good things about this XO, and I figured this would be a good time to try). The second midbass will kick in below appr. 400Hz to compensate for baffle losses. The whole will be actively crossed to a woofer in a sealed cabinet at the bottom of the baffle. The main concern I still have is the arrangement of the mid-high section. Can someone help me out with the pro's and cons of the MTM and TMM arrangements? Maybe some other comments before I start building? Thanks in advance, Emiel |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Hi
I vote for MMT since the crossover is not symetric. Try it both ways with out fancy crossover first. Easy right. I thought MTM was best for a long time, but I have a little doubt now.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
As your discussing a 2.5 way then the issues are really
normal woofer tweeter on top compared to inverted. MTM vs TMM is usually 2 way vs 2.5 way issues. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere near Enschede
|
Thanks for the answers!
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe somebody knows some info on the web on the differences between MTM and TMM? |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere near Enschede
|
It's about the tweeter/midbass arrangement:
MTM = From top to bottom: Midbass / Tweeter / Midbass TMM = From top to bottom: Tweeter / Midbass / Midbass |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are you (open) baffled yet? | ThorstenL | Multi-Way | 309 | 24th August 2010 03:03 PM |
| 3-Way design / MTMW | 69stingray | Multi-Way | 3 | 9th November 2005 02:12 AM |
| open baffled all over again | then_dude | Multi-Way | 58 | 5th April 2005 10:42 PM |
| Redesign my TMW to a TMMW with Shiva's | sunil | Multi-Way | 24 | 29th June 2004 05:45 AM |
| 5" enclosed or 6.5" open-baffled | coolkhoa | Multi-Way | 6 | 17th May 2004 03:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07878 seconds (77.65% PHP - 22.35% MySQL) with 10 queries |