|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EU- Electronic Union country
|
hi, I am thinking to add magnet to scan spek 18w9545. it has 88-88.5db I REALLY need at least gain 3%
it plays in 8ltr ported box how will change vas,qts and other pr. the box volume is stricly limitation of 7-9ltr thank in advance//
__________________
natural sound reproduction from traditional dynamic drivers?!! come on.. no no, it can be.. it must be!.. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EU- Electronic Union country
|
anybody?
__________________
natural sound reproduction from traditional dynamic drivers?!! come on.. no no, it can be.. it must be!.. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Vas, Qms and Fs will not change. You can estimate the change in Qe (and thus Qts) by messing around in WinISDPro, decresing Qe until you get the efficiency you want, or plug in the efficiency you want and let it work out Qe and Qts. I presume you want to gain 3dB not 3%, (or do you want 3% real efficiency ?) |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EU- Electronic Union country
|
hi thanks for the answer, I want to increase in 3db from 88db/w/m to 90-91db. that would be probably 3% gain in Bl force factor if I am not mistaken. is it posible to achieve 90-91db with extra magnet. as I understand one direction it woulkd be semi shielded and another direction increase BL and thus sensitivity? or I am mistaken? shame to say but I have never played with theese extra magnets and dont know anything
__________________
natural sound reproduction from traditional dynamic drivers?!! come on.. no no, it can be.. it must be!.. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
the mystery is why do you need 3dB extra ? Probably there is a much easier solution. PS edit: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EU- Electronic Union country
|
there is no mistery -I am doing wilson audio(alreday alsmost done) watt puppy 6 clone. not similar speaker or look like WA system 7 but exact . exact enclosures size and volume, exact weight(last was very hard job, used materials which is very good for damp[ing but not for health) grils, labels . - exact speakers. and 90% close to original series filter, I alreday get the same FR , phase xover points all I need is increase midrange sensitivity 3db. now I use L pad 4db for tweeters and 2.7ohm in series with woofers. to decrease woofers sensitivity is not very good idea. it tooked alsmost year to colect technical info about this speaker and spend lot of money for original dedicated midrange drivers (taken from wilson Benech 10 000eur speakers)
the speakers itsel has increribly speed and power,slamm from such a big and weight woofers and especialy midrange. . but sensitivity is 87db. too low to folow originals. so here is all story.. so only way is to beef up 3db from midrange ![]() adding 47Ohm resistors in series to tweeter improoves low frequency response!! this one was a joke
__________________
natural sound reproduction from traditional dynamic drivers?!! come on.. no no, it can be.. it must be!.. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
well using a autotransformer on the mid is a possibility, but you'd have to scale the crossover component values to suit. The consequence would lower impedance over the midrange, but you should get a similar voltage sensitivity, dB/2.83V. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: paris
|
i'm really interrested into this also ...
i have a couple of magnet i could use for testing, but i would need information about how to proceed. I could then do some T/S tests and see how the parameters changes |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EU- Electronic Union country
|
what is autotransformer?
are you suggesting to conect some thing to lower impedance of midrange?
__________________
natural sound reproduction from traditional dynamic drivers?!! come on.. no no, it can be.. it must be!.. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Wilson audio used OEM drivers similar to versions you can get off the shelf. You are correct about calculations of BL to increase sensitivity. I believe modifcations were done to widen the gap length including more of the VC thus increasing the L not B in the product. Magnet added would need to be inside the closed structure to include the pole piece, not easy for DIY.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can you tell me how to beef up PA100? | leadbelly | Chip Amps | 5 | 21st March 2004 07:20 PM |
| I want to beef-up this old Radio Shack sub... | The Paulinator | Multi-Way | 4 | 23rd June 2003 05:14 PM |
| Where's the beef? as it were. | pixie | Solid State | 5 | 6th February 2001 03:32 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11276 seconds (80.84% PHP - 19.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |