|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Why are some speakers more efficient than others? What actually causes a speaker to have low sensitivity, the tweeter, woofer, crossover and/or cabinet?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Weak magnets
Heavy cones Cones too small Badly designed enclosures etc |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aarhus
|
Efficiency=(constant) x volume x (f-3)^3
Read: if you want f-3 to change from 40 to 20 hz with an unchanged box volume, your speaker will have to be eight times less efficient. This is known as "the iron law" - unbendable, unless you fiddle with active electronics. The constant is unchanged for a given type of bass loading (larger for reflex than for closed box) Efficiency is in acoustic power (W), not a logarithmic dB scale. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aarhus
|
Bigwill: remember that small, heavy cones driven by weak magnets is the only way to get decent bass from a small enclosure - which is why these boxes invariably are inefficient.
Increase magnet strength, and your Q goes down, and the bass goes down - for a given enclosure. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
It's funny that, you'd think it would be the opposite (low Q drivers making more bass) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotterdam, NL
|
The 2 formulas used to calculate the efficiency:
5,44 e-4 x BL^2 x Sd^2 / (Re x Mms^2) and/or 9,6 e-10 Fs^3 x Vas / Qes 9,6 e-8 to get the answer in % So to get a high efficiency you want: High: Vas, Sd, Fs, BL Low: Qes/Qts, Re, Mms/Mmd Sensitivity is directly derived from the efficiency (n0), by 112 + 10 x log (n0) Wkr Johan
__________________
Impossibilities we do immediatly, miracles take slightly longer. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aarhus
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Like the above said, Hoffmans Iron law, You can change 2 of the 3 specs. Effeciency, box size, and low end extension. You can have a small box size and great low end extension, but your effeciency is going to be your weakness, or vise versa b/w any of the three specs.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
because you have an amplifier power available, speaker bass capabilty, output capability and speaker cabinet size budget. For moderm amplifiers 50w is typical. Low efficiency allows small speakers with reasonable bass, and given the size of the bass driver allows 50w of drive without overloading the driver. In all cases simply increasing efficiency will reduce bass. So for a given amount of power you trade loudness with bass. If you want to keep the bass you have to make the cabinet bigger. And typically higher efficiency speakers are not the smallest. But if your amplier is only 5 or so (single-ended) watts, then lowefficiency is a no-no due to limited loudness capability. High efficiency requires far bigger boxes than normal, or smaller speakers with relatively no bass compared to normal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
A different way to to look at it
If you could keep the VC in the sweet spot in the gap under all operating conditions with a fixed magnet size you will have high spl. Ok to do this and still have Low Fs cone needs to be big with a stiff suspension and small Xmax. This also means a big box to keep system Fc low. Ok now every one wants a speaker that goes low but it also has to be small. So start with the same magnet and smaller cone. Since the cone is smaller it has to move further to push the same volume of air. So this means Xmax must be bigger, If Xmax is bigger with the same magnet gap the coil is not fully contained in the sweet spot all the time so spl suffer. It's all a tradeoff
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3 way speaker sensitivity issue in car. | marchel | Multi-Way | 1 | 3rd January 2009 01:22 PM |
| How to increase Speaker Sensitivity | eddylws | Multi-Way | 4 | 6th September 2006 07:25 AM |
| speaker sensitivity | padego | Full Range | 5 | 28th March 2005 05:29 PM |
| Speaker sensitivity | future | Multi-Way | 26 | 26th June 2003 01:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10238 seconds (82.54% PHP - 17.46% MySQL) with 10 queries |