|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Martin has just posted the initial stage of his Lowther project. Includes measurements of T/S and FR of DX2, DX3, & DX4 models.
http://www.quarter-wave.com/Project04/Project04.html It will be really interesting to see how this project turns out. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Man, those are expensive driver...
from http://www.lowther-america.com/ DX series DX2 $695 DX3 $795 DX4 $1700 It will be interesting to see the results. The initial driver measurements look good. It is strange how having the drivers slightly off axis makes them almost perfectly flat. -- Brian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
I guess we should call him Martin Lowther King then.
Please don't PUNish me, Fred |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
On Hiatus
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Quote:
Now I do not have to write it. Thanks Mr Dickman ![]() --------------------------------------------- A question: What happens if I put a Lowther in a normal sealed enclosure? Why did it have to be horn? Will I be spitted on, if I do? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Amsterdam
|
I wish Martin good luck with his project.
I owe a lot to Martin's TL simulation software. It enabled me to design my TLsub, and it works great. I was wondering about his design philosophy with 200 watt SS as opposed to low wattage SEamps in order to be able to use passive correction. If you were to use ACTIVE correction would you not be able to have the best of both worlds?
__________________
Keep an open mind. It helps. Peter |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
On Hiatus
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
That was my thinking also, when I read the project.
Use active filter, before the amplifier. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
Thanks for the comments. I'll just add a couple of responses to some of the items above.
1) I think that Lowthers will work in a variety of enclosures, if you had a sub I think that a closed box would work well. I have a couple of new worksheets built around my quarter wave equations that will include internal acoustic filters and vibration absorbers so the enclosures I am planning on exploring will not necessarily be easily categorized. 2) Passive vs Active filtering, a couple of thoughts on why I am using passive. First I am not an amp designer or tweaker so putting an active circuit ahead of the amp is a little beyond my experience. Second, I would like my speakers to be self contained, they eventually will have to find new homes so they need to work in whatever system is available. Third, I am designing these speakers to work with a solid state amp so they will not be optimized for a tube amp. If I am using a solid state amp with the higher powers available I do not see any real disadvantage in using a passive set of filters. 3) Martin Lowther King? I guess I have been called worse. There are a whole group of guys that think the fibers move in a TL that are still calling me worse names. OK, thats my take on things. Thanks again for the feedback. Martin www.quarter-wave.com |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
On Hiatus
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Quote:
To provide the speakers along with active filters for putting somewhere before the end-stage, would be a soution for the chosen few. As a do-it-yourselfer, you can become blind for the practical reality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
Sorry, I am not sure I understand your post. I am afraid I am not real sharp and the point you were trying to make zipped right over my head. Could you help me out a little?
Thanks in advance, Martin www.quarter-wave.com |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
On Hiatus
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
Quote:
become obvious to me, right after I had written my post. halojoy |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| martin j king's sheets | bigcatdairy | Multi-Way | 8 | 31st October 2008 09:19 AM |
| Martin King's MLTL-48 for jx92 | keladrin | Full Range | 23 | 28th October 2007 07:58 AM |
| Martin King`s Fe167e MLTQWT | hacknet | Full Range | 0 | 18th May 2004 12:43 PM |
| help designing an martin king TL | matjans | Multi-Way | 7 | 17th November 2003 02:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12217 seconds (81.07% PHP - 18.93% MySQL) with 10 queries |