Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th February 2006, 11:08 AM   #1
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Question Protecting treble driver from DC?

Hi all,
I want to run my Acoustic Energy AE1s as active, driven from 4pole L-R into 100W+100W to treble & bass units.

If the treble unit has an in-line cap to protect it from errant poweramp maladies, how far below the 3kHz crossover should the cap roll off?

I am thinking of using 26u8F (10+10+6.8 propylene).
There are 4 of them for the corners of 5.1 surround.

Any comments?

The bass units will probably get electronic power amp switch off in event of DC output.
Further comment?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2006, 11:31 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
cocolino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bavaria (south of veal sausage equator)
Quote:
If the treble unit has an in-line cap to protect it from errant poweramp maladies, how far below the 3kHz crossover should the cap roll off?
In order that this cap does not "at all" interfere with the alignment of Your active crossover, as a rule of thumb I`d say it should roll off about 1/10th the crossover frequency.

1/10th the crossover fc would lead to rather big cap values.

In practise You might get away with smaller caps (higher roll-off point). You should try if and how much smaller cap values actually have audible impact on Your active crossover alignment.
__________________
Christoph
STEAL the BEST - INVENT the REST
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2006, 11:39 AM   #3
Bobken is offline Bobken  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Hi Andrew,

In my experience, no higher than 300Hz, being a decade lower than the X'over point.

This should at least avoid any phase or roll-off effects, which can commence at a decade lower than the -3dB point with a high pass filter.

Conversely, with a low pass filter, it is safer to ensure that there are no similar potentially adverse effects by using a decade higher than the anticipated -3dB X'over point.

Choice of caps used, however, IMO will also have a marked effect on the sound regardless of the chosen value, but that is another (notably contentious!) story.

Regards,
__________________
Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2006, 12:28 PM   #4
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
a decade lower was not the answer I wanted.

I was hoping someone could confirm that about two octaves lower would suffice. i.e. 750Hz for the 26u8F

What symptoms should I expect if the cap rolls off too close to the intended xo frequency?

L-R does not suit 5pole but can I do 3pole and add a 4th pole using the cap and still achieve L-R?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2006, 01:55 PM   #5
adason is offline adason  United States
diyAudio Member
 
adason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
hi,

in my humble opinion it realy does not have to be that low, as a matter of fact, if you start it roll over just under the tweeters active crossover, you can achieve steeper roll of which can be a great benefit to sound and power handling to the tweeter

ed
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2006, 03:33 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
cocolino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bavaria (south of veal sausage equator)
Quote:
What symptoms should I expect if the cap rolls off too close to the intended xo frequency?
The high pass filter function of the cap will "add" to the high pass filter of the active crossover (BTW: as well as does for example the inherent electro-mechanical high-pass filter function of a tweeter).

In other words, when You add another filter stage (the high-pass cap) to an existing (active) crossover, the latter does not exactly behave as it was intended.

As closer the cap high-pass filter fc is to the actual crossover fc, as more influence it has on the latter.
In addition to this, to what extend the added cap has impact also depends of the steepness of the crossover itself. A higher order crossover is less susceptible to this effects.

The symptoms would be phase & frequency variations from the "ideal" target response which would result in "non-ideal" on axis frequency response in the transition range as well as different vertical polar pattern.


Quote:
a decade lower was not the answer I wanted.
I was hoping someone could confirm that about two octaves lower would suffice. i.e. 750Hz for the 26u8F
The effects described above is what theoretically will happen when You add another filter stage to an existing "perfect" (textbook) one and theoretically You have to stay away a decade from the crossover fc to have negligible impact.
In practice however (acoustically) "perfect" aligned crossovers for speakers do not look like textbook filter designs.

So depending on how "perfect", or not, Your existing crossover is already acoustically aligned, the added HP-filter might even help to improve things, or to "misaligne" further.

Without knowing more about the actual speaker (drivers), it`s difficult to predict what exactly will happen acoustically when adding a 750Hz highpass.
However, also as said the added cap could have negative impact in Your particular case (depending on drivers, mounting positions etc.), I`m inclined to claim that a 750Hz/ 6dB high-pass will not have much (negative) effect on an active 3kHz/4th order LR-filter.

Whatever, the easiest way to find out would probably be to just try in situ and listen to the changes. Just parallel another of Your 26µ8F`s to the existing 26µ8F of one channel (which roughly makes for the theoretical 1 decade requirement) and You`ll see (hear) immediately how much difference it makes in practice.
__________________
Christoph
STEAL the BEST - INVENT the REST
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protecting a microcontroller rtarbell Parts 10 11th January 2008 01:23 AM
protecting a VR tube jarthel Tubes / Valves 14 10th May 2007 12:21 AM
why is my amp protecting? mbugua Class D 2 19th January 2007 12:58 PM
protecting mosfets in UcD zilog Class D 10 12th November 2006 07:52 PM
protecting my speakers from my GC damitamit Chip Amps 13 16th June 2003 03:46 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Page generated in 0.10635 seconds (76.13% PHP - 23.87% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio