|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: U.S.
|
I ordered a pair of Precision Ports from Parts express. They are the 2 inch ports flared on both ends. I have made the Zaph L18 project to specs, and im going to being these ports. The only trouble Im having is that they seem awfully big for the enclosure. My calculations tell me to have a port length of 7.6 inches. Maybe its just me, but the port just flat out looks to large. Im i doing this properly??
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am unfamiliar with Zaph's L18 project.
The only thing I can tell you about the Precision Ports is that it is recommended that a port flared on both sides should be one flare length longer than the what a straight pipe would be. The flare length for the 2" Precision Port is 1 1/8" long. So if the project calls for a 2 inch diameter pipe 4 inches long, and you use a port flared on both ends, your port should be 5 1/8" long. If the tuning requires a 6 inch long piece of straight pipe, the flared port should be 7 1/8" long. And so on. If you have a link to Zaph's L18 project, perhaps I can give you more info.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: U.S.
|
The web site link is
http://www.zaphaudio.com/audio-speaker17.html ...really cool website. I have also accounted for the flared ends already. The physical size of the port being there just seems to big. Maybe ill post a pic of what im talking about. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The Precision Ports flare out to something like a diameter of 4.5 inches. That's the principle they wortk on-to provide a gradual transition for the air to go from the small, crowded port to the large room.
I'll admit that when you put them on the ends, they look mighty big. If it makes you feel any better, the straight pipes themselves take up 22 cu inches of space, the ports-even if they were cylinders 1 1/8" long by 4.5" diameters-would only take up 35 cu inches. That's 57 cu inches of space, your box is around 800 cu inches, so the ports take up less than 7% of the box volume. Which is essentially negligible. But yes, they do look large, especially for a half cu ft box.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: U.S.
|
aight that makes better sense. Thanks for taking the time to explain. I wasnt thinking about it in terms of volume. I guess its not so bad. thanks
They are sure are nice looking too. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, they are nice. Good luck with them.
A friend just bought a pair and installed them. Using the formula you are using, he got the tuning within 1 Hz of what he was aiming for.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rear port and front port | barry.childs | Multi-Way | 10 | 27th February 2009 09:46 AM |
| Slot port vs circular port equivalence | Brisso57 | Multi-Way | 12 | 21st February 2009 02:38 PM |
| Single Port Vent Better than Dual Port? | Daveis | Multi-Way | 18 | 15th July 2007 05:12 AM |
| To port or not to port? Newbie with newly built mains | starquake | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th December 2004 12:51 PM |
| rear port vs front port | Jimmy154 | Multi-Way | 22 | 6th March 2004 08:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08822 seconds (74.84% PHP - 25.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |