|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, bristol
|
I'm learning the various filters at the moment and designing my crossovers.
In the Active Filter One documentation which is very useful, the input filter on page 5 (values on page 22) is not explained. http://www.delta-audio.com/Active_Fi...umentation.pdf I can see R3,C2 are a low pass to filter noise. The R1,C1,R2 match the shelving low pass shematic on Linkwitz labs. My calc shows that it gives a gain of 2, but will start to cut the output very slightly at eg 1.99 at 16kHz. Is this a mistake or is it that -0.5% is not something to worry about ? Or have I made a mistake calculating? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
Depending on what opamp you use, C1 may not be needed. It is there to ensure stability of the input filter. \Jens |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, bristol
|
Will it be needed with opa2134?
Can I use 22pf instead? Just to move a bit further away from audio range. Or is it deliberate to cut the output above 20KHz? PS. Jens, thanks for the Active One manual, it is very useful for a beginner like me. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Jimbo,
In the Linkwitz-type EQ filters C1 would generally be a larger value to move the center frequency well within the audio band to accomplish an EQ goal. If this amplifier section is to be used simply as a gain section then C1 would be a much lower value component which would bring the voltage gain equal to unity (1) at frequencies above the audio band. With an OPA2134 the circuit will probably work fine without it, but it won't really hurt anything to leave it in. For a non-inverting amplifer Av is equal to R1/R2+1....or 2.0 (6db) if R1=R2. The circuit (and PCB) is setup very nicely by Jens so you have the option to configure this stage in a number of different ways. Cheers, Davey. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about active filter noise | sol | Solid State | 2 | 17th August 2006 05:59 AM |
| Active filter question | youyoung21147 | Parts | 3 | 21st May 2006 05:27 PM |
| Noob question : what exactly is the "Q" of an active filter ? | youyoung21147 | Chip Amps | 7 | 10th December 2005 09:39 PM |
| active filter from rod elliot and sub filter questions | wuffer | Parts | 0 | 2nd October 2005 01:12 PM |
| Active Filter - GvT | GvTT | Solid State | 0 | 3rd February 2004 09:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10058 seconds (75.01% PHP - 24.99% MySQL) with 10 queries |