|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was trying to find a mathematical way of determining the amount of power that different frequencies use, or..... where a crossover aught to be purly from a power distribution point of view. Since audio response is logarithmic, I thought about finding the halfway point useing:
1/2 Log(20000) [for a 20-20KHz signal]. However the answer is only 141Hz. Even if you add in the 20Hz at the bottom, 161Hz doesn't seem right. Any educated thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think the way you find the logarithmic halfway point between two frequencies is:
sq rt (20 * 20,000) = 632.456
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
The Linkwitz site has a simple spreadsheet to calculate SPL sensitivity for various driver sizes. For one single driver, due to differences in beaming characteristics, a formula works for the specific driver itself.
__________________
Hear the real thing! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, bristol
|
Quote:
I decided instead to pay attention to the idea of avoiding crossing in the range 300 to 3000Hz. My system will be 40-200, 200-20k. I'd quite like to know whether one of those bands deserves a bigger amplifier than the other. 50W is more than enough for the 200-20k driver but I could up the power to the woofer if it was required to match the higher range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
If you listen at very high levels (have to shout to be heard) then you may benefit from higher power amplifiers for low frequencies, especially if you have inefficient speakers.
OTOH, some of the world's most highly-regarded (tube) amplifiers have fewer than 10 Watts and most folks probably use less than a single watt more than they realize.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
Quote:
The equation is N=log (f2/f1) /log 2 where f2 is the upper frequency and f1 is the lower frequency. Get N to be equal between the frequency ranges than you use the same amount of power.
__________________
Hear the real thing! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks for the varied replies:
Rich - yes there is an article about bi-amping. which has a table showing 350Hz. Rod tantalisingly says he worked it out but doesn't show the formula. The rest of the table was worked out by Fane so I'm going to take 350 as the righ answer, but I don't know how they got there. soongsc - Your formula is incorrect unless the answer is 9.8Hz. Wiz - close, but I don't follow the logic. The root(?) off1 times(?)f2 |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Whatever freq you find assumes that energy is equally distributed per freq, and that all the drivers are the same efficiency.
The latter at least is not likely true unless you have a very large box for the bass driver(s), and or accept a highish low freq cutoff.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Noah |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK, bristol
|
I've seen that table before, it's one of the examples of incomplete explanation that I was thinking of.
Does it state the assumption it makes about lowest frequency? Also what if we want 3 bands? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| power distribution and sensitivity in a 3 way | habanero | Multi-Way | 35 | 5th December 2008 12:25 PM |
| 3 Way Power Distribution | kucharcity | Multi-Way | 46 | 14th May 2008 10:17 PM |
| Speaker power distribution | darw82 | Multi-Way | 3 | 23rd August 2007 02:53 PM |
| power distribution | robotnation | Multi-Way | 6 | 11th December 2005 10:27 PM |
| Power distribution among speakers? | Tucson Bill | Car Audio | 1 | 11th January 2005 03:40 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10699 seconds (82.46% PHP - 17.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |