|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11th September 2001, 10:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
|
For 2nd order butterworth, Linkwitz-Riley, and bessel circuits, the values of C and L are always the same for the high-pass and low-pass by calculations. However, these C and L values for hi and low-pass are always different in a crossover which sold by the market.
Would someone tell me why? |
|
|
11th September 2001, 12:17 PM
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
|
Ray
The calculations for the crossover which give equal L and C are based on the assumption of a resistive load. In practice, speaker drive unit loads are not a pure resistance but have reactive components as well. The values of L and C are therefore adjusted to give a flat response with the particular drive units being used. Geoff |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Crossover components | TurboFC3S | Swap Meet | 1 | 18th July 2007 06:19 PM |
| Crossover components in the UK | inrank | Multi-Way | 16 | 14th March 2007 11:23 AM |
| Crossover components | JC | Multi-Way | 13 | 19th October 2003 02:32 PM |
| Crossover components: what should I use? | LKS | Multi-Way | 2 | 25th September 2003 01:33 PM |
| crossover components | zach | Multi-Way | 1 | 19th August 2001 07:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
