|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: N/A
|
Happy New Year,
Many users use with AudioTechnology 18H52, but somebody try the AudioTechnology 18H52 versus the FlexUnits 5H52 woofer? Which mid-woofer sound better and going to deep bass and better midrange? This woofer use for 2 way system. Thanks you guys |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
I used both, the cquenze is smoother in mediums if not they are almost identical, the cquenze is less expensive what does not return it less good quite to the contrary
it is less dear bus the moulded frame what costs less to the labour. the profile of membrane of the cquenze gives better a linearity, all parameter T&S identical are thus preferred the cquenzeAldo |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Scan 2904/7100-01 and C-Quenze 18H52 | echo | Swap Meet | 1 | 6th February 2006 03:04 AM |
| FS: C-Quenze 18H52, SS 15W, 21W, 9700 | echo | Swap Meet | 5 | 4th January 2006 03:41 AM |
| Skaaning question (again ;) ) | Audist | Multi-Way | 0 | 31st May 2005 03:39 PM |
| Skaaning (AudioTechnology) woofers | Audist | Multi-Way | 7 | 10th May 2005 08:14 PM |
| Skaaning Flex | Oz_Audio | Multi-Way | 4 | 22nd July 2002 07:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06268 seconds (68.58% PHP - 31.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |