|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denmark
|
My B&W 803 speakers have separate terminals for the low and high frequency sections, for use with bi-wire setup.
My preamp can feed two power amps and I wonder whether it might be an idea to let one power amp drive the low frequency section and another (identical brand/model) drive the high frequency section, but without active cross over. The built-in passive cross over in the speakers will take care of the cross over task. Pros & cons in this bi-amp setup without active cross over? Rather go for one 2x200W amp with biwiring than two 2x100W amps in a bi-amp setup without active x-over? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
the main advantage of the active c/o is the increase in dynamic range that you get. e.g. 2 100W amplifiers actively c/o @ ~ 300Hz will have the dynamic range of a 400W amplifer driving a normal c/o. Of the options you mention, 2 x 100W or a single 200W bi-wired, IMO the 2x100W option will sound better most of the time. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Another benefit of bi-amplification is a reduction in intermodulation distortion.
An informative website with an article about this is here: http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm Be sure to check out the rest of the website for more information and the second part of that article. The general conclusion I got from the article was that with passive crossovers it is probably a better buy to get a bigger amp instead of two smaller ones. Just don't leave that jumper installed if you Bi-amp! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
|
Quote:
Not much point to that unless you're selling amplifiers (two 100W amps cost more than one 200W amp). |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
|
(sorry for my english)
Hi Klitgt, You have a good opportunity to test two different amp : one big solid state on the bass + one "kind"little tube amp ( or something like Pass Zen,Aleph,etc.) on the mid-high. Obyouvsly one must be have an input level control due to the different gain. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
What work does the crossover in the speaker do? If you connect to the "high" and "low out puts, wouldn't the x-over be isolated? I don't understand the question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Theres no point in biamping without an active, or passive line level XO.
The later being an option with relatively simple xos and baffle step compensation where power amp input impedance and preamp are suited to deal with the insertion loss. Without a line level / active XO, the amps are just parallel.
__________________
Be sure your foil hat has a good low impedance ground. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hold up. I get it;
Your Bi-amp plan involves running both amps at the full range with the presumption that the speakers' crossover will sort it out. If you have "hi" and "low" out on your pre amp, isn't that already crossed over? If you have Hi and Low speaker inputs, I presume that they would bypass the crossover. If they don't, i would think that you have a risk of correcting your amps in parallel. Scary! In any case running your amps full range negates most of the advantages of biamping. crossover - amps - Drivers |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
By the way, Thats a great link Joe, but I can't understand how the output from 2 amps adds up to twice as much as a single large amp.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
|
Quote:
When you split the signal before the amplifire you don't need that extra current+power reserve that you're not going to use on a musical signal. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active XO Bi-amping with Trends TA10.1 | OzMikeH | Class D | 13 | 6th January 2008 11:04 AM |
| tri-amping and active xover - TOTAL SEPARATES? | tlparker | Multi-Way | 100 | 5th October 2006 02:32 AM |
| active cross over | Kongen | Multi-Way | 15 | 23rd February 2005 03:26 PM |
| bi-amping (active crossover) | keyser | Multi-Way | 16 | 28th January 2005 09:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11379 seconds (76.67% PHP - 23.33% MySQL) with 10 queries |