|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Hello everyone,
currently I'm measuring some 15" woofers. The problem is that I get very different results when I use different source voltages. The first time, the amplifier provided 0.75 V at 200 Hz. I got a Qes of 0.42 and a Qts of 0.37, so the driver seemed to be suitable for a vented box. The second time, the amplifier provided 0.99 V at 100 Hz. The results were quite different from the first time, a qes of 0.71 and a qts of 0.63 . With these results, the driver would be suited for a closed enclosure rather than a vented one. Can anyone tell me what voltage I should use when measuring the t/s parameters? I used the guidelines provided at http://www.diysubwoofers.org/measure.htm and http://sound.westhost.com/tsp.htm best regards Erwin |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
There is no set voltage that you perform T/S tests at.
Most texts recommend a different procedure (constant current rather than constant voltage) from the links you specify. Do a search for 'Thiele Impedometer' and you will find an article on epanorama with the typical procedure. T/S parameters vary with level, but they should not vary as much as you describe over such a small range of voltage - I would suspect the measurement method or perhaps you made an error.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
Just repeating really, but T/S do change with voltage but not to the degree your talking about over a relatively small voltage increase.
This is the kind of situation where the 'repeat count' functonality and consistency of Speaker Workshop come in to its own (as opposed to manual method)
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
For example, should i use a 100 hz signal to obtain a certain voltage across the resistor, or a higher/lower frequency? regards Erwin |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I use a 50Hz signal as that's where most meters are most accurate. If you are using the voltage divider (pseudo current source) method, I use a 10 ohm resistor as the calibration resistor and develop 100mV across it.
It is also essential IMO to perform a calibration sweep across a few different frequencies to see how your meter reacts. Most do not stay the same. As others have said you must have some other factor influencing your results because they should not change that much.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Quote:
The point is, if the t/s parameters change with source voltage, what voltage would be the best to measure with... best regards Erwin |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
it's a long time since I did the testing but I recall that the constant current method is done at very low voltages. T/S parameters are for small signal only. The speaker voltage (after the series resistor) at resonance was about 500mV and less than 100mV at medium frequencies. The frequency to check your equipment should be in the long low impedance saddle above the resonant peak of the driver. When you do a sweep it is easy to find the peak and also the low impedance above it. After a couple of octaves the impedance starts to rise again. This is then too high a frequency. How have you solved reading the voltage at the very lowest frequencies? i.e. below resonance.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
The constant current method (I just follow the guidelines from the epanorama article) gives accurate results in my case, so I'm able to get reliable t/s parameters now. Thanks everyone for advice! regards Erwin |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle or Shanghai
|
Personally I like to measure at a drive level where the average output of the driver in the range of interest will be ~85 dB SPL.
For example, for a subwoofer driver, I'll do a few FR measurements and adjust the drive level until the 30-100 Hz range averages 85 dB. Then I measure at that same drive level. Likewise, for a midwoofer, I'll set the drive level so that the average SPL from 80 Hz to 3 kHz is 85 dB. I believe this way you end up with T/S parameters that are consistent with typical medium-loud operation, and will give a different recommended box than what you would get from small, 10-50mV drive levels. Dan Wiggins Adire Audio® |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi DanW,
I have never tested at high voltage. Which parameters are most sensitive to the different test voltages? By how much do they differ? All, Accurate low frequency voltage readings??? My multimeter cannot pick up consistent rms voltage readings at frequencies around 15Hz and below. F(lower) is often well below 20Hz. I tried using the scope set to no timebase to pick up the peak voltage and convert back to rms. This is not particularly accurate and leads to big changes in parameters when a spread of F(lower) are inserted into the spreadsheet.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wrong Voltage / current on BoZ... or Wrong Measuring ? | gionag | Pass Labs | 8 | 14th May 2008 11:24 AM |
| RTA measuring with DEQ | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 0 | 7th July 2006 04:24 AM |
| measuring voltage rails | Scribble | Chip Amps | 8 | 20th October 2004 12:03 AM |
| measuring amp output voltage | emarald | Solid State | 1 | 5th April 2003 01:29 PM |
| Rail voltage compared to transformer voltage | SteveG | Solid State | 4 | 22nd July 2002 11:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12109 seconds (82.17% PHP - 17.83% MySQL) with 10 queries |