I've updated the standing wave calculator to calculate dimensions based on ratios. I've added one useable ratio so far.
If anyone can help give me other irrational ratios suitable for speaker enclosures in x/1/y format, that would be very helpful.
http://www.vikash.info/audio/standing_wave_calc/
If anyone can help give me other irrational ratios suitable for speaker enclosures in x/1/y format, that would be very helpful.
http://www.vikash.info/audio/standing_wave_calc/
The square root of 2 is ~1.414, not 1.141.
Usual quoted enclosure ratios are based on:
phi = golden ratio = 1.6180339887499 why do I remember this number to so many decimal places?
1.2
1.25
IMO, none of these is better than any other or any number you could come up with. It makes a lot more difference how you mount your drivers on the baffle (for diffraction) than what the box dimension ratios are. Lining or stuffing in the box is used to damp out the resonances.....
Your app calculates axial resonances, but there are also tangential and oblique resonances, and all are excited differently depending on where you mount the drivers...
Usual quoted enclosure ratios are based on:
phi = golden ratio = 1.6180339887499 why do I remember this number to so many decimal places?
1.2
1.25
IMO, none of these is better than any other or any number you could come up with. It makes a lot more difference how you mount your drivers on the baffle (for diffraction) than what the box dimension ratios are. Lining or stuffing in the box is used to damp out the resonances.....
Your app calculates axial resonances, but there are also tangential and oblique resonances, and all are excited differently depending on where you mount the drivers...
Tapered boxes are good too; but these ratios are certainly better than integers, 1/2/2 for example. AND you should also line &/or stuff. Nothin' wrong with belt and braces. And positiong drivers non-equidistant from box edges, (which should have radii > 4 inches) also helps.
But one thing at a time, this is a nifty little calculator.
But one thing at a time, this is a nifty little calculator.
Ron,Ron E said:Usual quoted enclosure ratios are based on:
phi = golden ratio = 1.6180339887499 why do I remember this number to so many decimal places?
1.2
1.25
IMO, none of these is better than any other or any number you could come up with...
Agreed. But I tend to use the square root of phi (c. 1.27202) for the front of my woofer and subwoofer boxes as it looks better, rather than for any sound reasons. That way the ratio W/H is 1.618/1 (and when you're looking at it from a standing position, perspective also fools you into thinking it's the same ratio W/D).
Internal standing waves I try to damp out (or confuse) by:
1) damping materials;
2) internal bracing with small (eg 2" or 3") holes in it;
3) internal bracing at odd angles and shapes (eg. dowels of different sizes, braces at 15, 22.5, 30 and 45 degrees).
UNLESS I'm doing a TL...
But, Vikash, I think you've got 1.28 in your calculator anyway - and that's close enough to 1.27202
Vikash said:Any input on the default threshold value? How close is too close?
A number based on a percentage of the size of the wavelength is probably better than a fixed number....
I see you removed the very useful 1.28 ratio (when you put it back it might as well be 1.272.
dave
Dave the square root of Phi (1.272) can be used by selecting 0.5 from the factor dropdown. Try some others as well and you might end up with dimensions that look half appealing / have a realistic baffle width
http://www.vikash.info/audio/standi...t_factor=2&height=&width=&depth=&threshold=50
http://www.vikash.info/audio/standi...t_factor=2&height=&width=&depth=&threshold=50
Vikash said:the factor dropdown.
Actually, that is totally confusing... a bit of an explain of what it does would be useful...
dave
[slightly OT]
vikash, can't you just use php/GD ? quite some work i'd imagine but it'll let you just 'draw' from inside your php scripts
http://www.php.net/GD
[/OT]
vikash, can't you just use php/GD ? quite some work i'd imagine but it'll let you just 'draw' from inside your php scripts
http://www.php.net/GD
[/OT]
I use perl I thought about using SVG as I have done before, but I'm there must be a way of rendering simple 3D objects which already have the lower routines implemented.
If there was an equivelant of php/GD for perl then that would work. I'll have to rummage through cpan again. Couldn't see anything obvious last time...
If there was an equivelant of php/GD for perl then that would work. I'll have to rummage through cpan again. Couldn't see anything obvious last time...
Vikash said:I use perl
print "There can be only one\n";
If there was an equivelant of php/GD for perl then that would work. I'll have to rummage through cpan again. Couldn't see anything obvious last time...
There is. If you look through Freshmeat for perl-based image galleries, it'll list the equivalent module. I forget what it is, but that's how I found it
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Irrational ratios/enclosure dimensions