|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
I'm looking to buy an amp for my Dayton RS Dipole speaker project and was wondering how much power you think the dual 12" HiFi woofers will want? I know a guy that has an Audiosource AmpOne that he can ship to me that does 100w RMS @4 ohms x 2 but I'll have to pay him first for it. Do you think 100w will be enough in a dipole config? I'll be EQing the low end of these to be as flat as possible to 20hz and they will be used in a room that will be roughly 13x18x8 for music duties. I do not want a separate sealed sub to take care of the bottom octave.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
|
Maz
100W will for sure be able to bottom out the woofers in free air (aka dipole). However, getting much output at 20Hz with only 2 12'' will be more difficult. Have you tried playing around with SL's dipole spreadsheets? What dipole config were you going for (h-frame, W-frame, etc.)? -Brian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
I did mess around with SL's spreadsheets a LONG time ago, so maybe I should check back into those.
The speakers are going to use an H-frame and resemble the Orions, only that mine will have an MTM for the top section using Dayton RS180s and a Dayton RS28 tweeter. Thanks for the input and for anyone else who wishes to chime in! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think that for design purposes you can treat them similarly to the Peerless XLS in the Orion. Two 10"s per side will give you reasonable output, two 12"s per side for higher volume and deeper bass. The dipole worksheet really tells the story in detail.
Either configuration, in dipole, would benefit greatly from a sealed monopole sub- but most of the benefit would be noticed for home theater. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HPSA1000-R for Dayton HF15 midbass/dipole/line array | thadman | Solid State | 1 | 11th January 2007 06:27 PM |
| HPSA1000-R for Dayton HF15 midbass/dipole/line array | thadman | Subwoofers | 0 | 11th January 2007 05:50 PM |
| Dayton IB 385. Any good in OB dipole/ripolel? | fergs1 | Subwoofers | 2 | 4th November 2006 08:08 PM |
| Seas Excel mids vs. dayton rs mids in dipole | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 2 | 10th July 2006 06:28 PM |
| Any current dayton RS dipole project posted? | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 24 | 4th February 2006 06:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08035 seconds (70.77% PHP - 29.23% MySQL) with 10 queries |