Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th November 2005, 09:09 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default FE168EZ Open Baffle

How do I calculate the low frequency dropp-off point for the FE168EZ Sigma on an open baffle? SL's Website explains the calculation in terms of finding the Fequal point, but I can't seem to make sense of his math... in Fequal .17v/D, what exactly does v and D stand for and what units should I use?

Also, in line with the Orion design, would the FE168Ez make a suitable pairup with the FT17 Supertweeter in an open baffle? I am considering the pros and cons of using different drivers in the setup. I can design and make my own electronic crossover and amplifier. I would prefer to use crossover points of 250 and 8-10K. I can't seem to find many successful examples of the 168 in an open baffle.

Last, would two FE 108s work with the FT17 in a MTM Open Baffle as an alternative?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2005, 09:17 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Default Re: FE168EZ Open Baffle

Quote:
Originally posted by audioferret
How do I calculate the low frequency dropp-off point for the FE168EZ Sigma on an open baffle? SL's Website explains the calculation in terms of finding the Fequal point, but I can't seem to make sense of his math... in Fequal .17v/D, what exactly does v and D stand for and what units should I use?
v is the speed of sound at 1130 feet/second
D is the path difference between front and back waves

D is approximately half the width of a flat baffle but should be determined empirically
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2005, 01:57 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Unhappy Is this corect>

I get 42.68 Hz when I multiply 1130 by .17 and then divide by 4.5 inches for half of the width of a 9" baffle.

Is that a correct estimation? I was estimating around 250 Hz based on the table in the "Single-Driver-Website." Does the actual driver used matter or is the primary factor the width of the baffle? If I use .75 inch plywood, do I need to take plywood material or baffle thickness into account?

Thank you for your assistance, I really like the Fostex driver and the pair I mentioned above would have a higher SAF than the current pair in the Orion. The wife is not happy about the cost either, and I need to try to minimize that...
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2005, 03:37 AM   #4
adolphe is offline adolphe  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario / Kentucky
check your units. I think you're mixing feet and inches. That's why everyone should work in SI units
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2005, 03:44 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default Doh!

Yes, 1130 Feet/second is quite different from 13560 inches per second.

That leaves me with an FEqual coefficient of 2305.2/x where x equals half of the baffle width. Why not just keep the math simple and leave it at 2305.2/x?

I am such an idiot.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2005, 07:17 AM   #6
Rudolf is offline Rudolf  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Rudolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Default Re: FE168EZ Open Baffle

Quote:
Originally posted by audioferret
I can't seem to find many successful examples of the 168 in an open baffle.
I wonder if you could find any! With its low Qts and small Xmax the 168E Sigma is a typical horn driver - quite the opposite of what you want for OB.

If you want to get a realistic picture of its behaviour in an OB, try xlbaffle.xls http://baseportal.de/cgi-bin/basepor...&cmd=all&Id=15
__________________
www.dipolplus.de
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? 454Casull Multi-Way 15 19th May 2012 03:12 PM
Open-baffle baffle length matejS Multi-Way 2 21st September 2010 04:49 PM
Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] keithpeter Full Range 10 11th September 2007 07:59 PM
what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? kappa546 Multi-Way 6 24th January 2006 10:21 PM
Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) tktran Multi-Way 13 29th November 2004 11:09 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2