|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
|
Hello,
last weekend I built a speaker enclosure for testing out my Peerless drivers. Peerless CSX 176 H Peerless DT 100 Because I wish to build two-way floorstanding speakers with those, enclosure height was not a concern. So I decided to build a "classic" TL enclosure. This single-fold testing-TL is ~85 inch long, and CSA: S0=2.8Sda, SL=0.7Sd. When stuffed, it seems to give a nice bass response to low 30~35Hz in room (depending on placement). I found this page and noticed that his "Garnet II" bookshelf-speaker uses the same DT 100 tweeter and Peerless' five-inch version of CSX-series. I'm just wondering, could the crossover of his Garnet II be used with my transmission line speaker(s) with little (or little more) modification? Any comments? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
Hi Arcturus,
I used a similar xover with Peerless HDS 5" & Tweeter @ 3000Hz, but with no zobel/notch, it worked very well; If you're using the same drivers as Lou, you'll likely have no problem, but will need to deal with BSC because of the different shape of your cabinet, probably by tweaking the notch as mentioned on the Garnet site. Pete McK |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
|
Hello PeteMc
Thanks for your time. I'm using the Peerless' 850122 woofers in my speakers, which are 6,5", while the Garnet has 850108 5" woofers. But their frequency response is of course not identical, but actually quite close to each other... I tried this crossover and it sounds quite nice. Especially when I replaced the woofer's 1,2 mH serial coil with 2,0 mH. (Baffle step correction?) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Peerless 6.5" CSX 850122 | Nm2285 | Swap Meet | 1 | 18th October 2006 07:24 PM |
| Wtb Peerless 850122 Csx 6-1/2" Woofer | kestrel200 | Swap Meet | 0 | 21st February 2005 11:15 PM |
| peerless 850122 efficiency | michael | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th January 2004 11:36 AM |
| Peerless 850122 vs 850439 | michael | Multi-Way | 0 | 24th January 2004 06:13 AM |
| Whats the difference between the Peerless 831916 and Peerless 850122 | SkinnyBoy | Multi-Way | 9 | 12th June 2003 03:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07479 seconds (72.14% PHP - 27.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |