Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th November 2005, 03:29 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
Default Low bass horns: Volvotreter v Keele, driver A v B . .

I intended to do horns from 75 – 400 & 400 Hz up.
Below 75 Hz an active Peerless sealed XLS.

Then I read Edgar saying if you switch from midbass horn to a box at 75 Hz, the difference was pronounced. So I started looking into an extra bass horn with flare maybe 40 Hz, using Volvotreter’s spreadsheet.

Could it be small enough it to fit the SAF?
I spent hours finding & typing dozens of Fs, Qes & VAS into Volvotreter’s spreadsheet til 2 am. I found a guitar speaker (the Jensen C12R), that due to having very high Qes (2.06), needed the smallest horn. And only USD 45! Perfect! ~

But hang on, Fs of that driver is a high 74 Hz, it’s output on a baffle is down about 15 dB by the time you reach 40 Hz – below Fs: what happens to output in a (correctly sized) horn ??

Then, I plugged some driver parameters into this formula from Keele’s “Low Frequency Horn Design Using TS Parameters”:

The bounds of resistance controlled operation of a horn = (QTS)(fS)

For the Jensen C12R = 1.88 * 74
= 139 Hz ~ way too high

So Keele’s logic appears to say - very bad choice.

What is resistance controlled operation??
Btw, Keele says a LOW Qts is desirable, both for extended high frequency operation AND for extended low frequency operation.
The greater the bandwidth that the horn must cover, the higher Fs must be and the lower Qts must be.

I have the drivers for the 75 Hz midbass horn - JBL 2202Hs, which have a very low Qts (0.17), and according to Keele will function from 8 – 313 Hz! While their Fmh (often considered conservative) is a much higher 588 Hz. I’m not too worried about the
top end of the range.

Who is right?

** What combination of driver parameters and correct formula most reliably predict a driver will work at a specified low frequency?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2005, 11:15 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
To put it another simpler way, what is the most reliable software or spreadsheet on the web for modelling horns?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2005, 01:51 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
mwmkravchenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth Canada
Default Go with what you have Bud

I'd download Hornresponse.

It is probably the best free horn design program available.

There is a good tutorial in the Wiki section of the forum.

In short the low Qts is what you are looking for. And if you have the drivers I would go with them. A driver can be driven below it resonance in a horn. The chamber that you will have to make to load the back of the driver will when sized correctly help it to behave.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/dmcbean/

Mark
__________________
Mark
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2005, 06:33 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
I've just had a small play with Hornresp.

> It is probably the best free horn design program available.

I guess it produces FR graphs??

I would have used before it if I had been able to . . I know there is a new “Entry guide” glossary in the Wiki.

> low Qts is what you are looking for

You’re probably right, but Volvotreter’s well known spreadsheet suggests the opposite . . ?

As well as getting good results by plugging numbers into a program, I want to understand the science:
ok, a driver can be driven below it resonance in a horn, but what happens to it’s output level (in an appropriately sized horn) ??

> The chamber that you will have to make to load the back of the driver will when sized correctly help it to behave.

I have some prefab horns, presumably Hornresp can model chamber sizes.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New fold for Volvotreter's 38 Hz TH Don Snyder Subwoofers 38 23rd January 2011 10:04 PM
bass horns SIRDRINKSALLOT Subwoofers 15 27th March 2009 07:15 AM
LM3875 bass amp oris horns Diy martin Chip Amps 0 4th November 2006 07:18 PM
Bass Horns...... How come so small? Mikett Multi-Way 10 14th January 2004 01:19 PM
Bass Horns? Chris_SWE Multi-Way 7 7th January 2002 03:58 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Page generated in 0.09635 seconds (77.63% PHP - 22.37% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio