|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: N/A
|
Dear All,
I'm looking for disign the "best" cabinet with the very low resonance and send away the standing waves from the inside of the cabinet. I looking for monitor loudspeakers like Peak Consult InCognito and Rockport Technologies Merak II loudspeaker. The material that I can to use is only wood (MDF, Plywood...). What you think can give me the best result, rectangle shape or triangle (asymmetric cabinet). What about the build cabinet like the picture here? Is really good idea or that is unnecessary and I can get same result with good stuffing? I open for new and better idea. Thanks all |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zárate, Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
Hi, the best destiny I know for the back cone air movement, is the Tline, if you have space, of course.
Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
It seems your design goals are:
1. Prevent the enclosure from producing sound 2. Prevent the rear wave from reflecting and passing through the cone as a delayed source An enclosure would radiate sound from the vibrations transmitted from the driver and from the variations in the pressure of the internal air volume. The former can be prevented by mechanically isolating the driver from the cabinet (say, a foam gasket for sealing and some sort of rear support for the driver), and the latter can be attenuated with enough stuffing and/or an open back. Alternatively, you could build an ultra-heavy enclosure, or an constrained-layer-damped enclosure whose walls would convert vibration into harmless amounts of heat. To prevent the rear wave from escaping through the cone, you can use an open-backed enclosure and stuff it if you don't want dipole operation (the lower the passband, the more stuffing you need), or, as B&W has done, use a driver with a cone whose material is a good insulator of sound (Rohacell in their sub drivers). You can also build a large and/or deep enclosure and stuff it, with the idea being that the rear wave will have completely dissipated by the time it has propogated to the walls, reflected, and has almost reached the driver. Again, B&W does this with their tapered tube and sphere/inverted horn enclosures. I'm not quite sure what effect standing waves inside the enclosure would have besides a stronger sound passing through the cone. In any case, in a sealed enclosure, varying the internal dimensions such that none are multiples of each other will distribute the frequencies at which standing waves are prone to occur. Stuffing can then clean up whatever's left. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
|
While that enclosure is impressive looking the little wood fingers would only be effective over a limited frequency range and their effect would be totally swamped by a suitable fill, in that particular application they're doing more good as extra mass and bracing on the cabnet walls than any damping/diffraction effect they have.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Minimising standing waves | GerhardW | Multi-Way | 13 | 2nd September 2008 07:43 PM |
| Standing waves, anyone willing to experiment ? | jay1st | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th February 2008 01:33 AM |
| standing waves and cancellation & exageration ? | lolojr1 | Subwoofers | 13 | 19th July 2005 05:24 PM |
| Standing waves again... | Vikash | Multi-Way | 4 | 3rd June 2004 11:25 PM |
| Golden ratios and standing waves | Vikash | Multi-Way | 36 | 27th September 2003 02:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07785 seconds (81.63% PHP - 18.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |