Calculations of bass-reflex enclosures - generally !!! - diyAudio
 Calculations of bass-reflex enclosures - generally !!!
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 7th October 2005, 01:41 PM #1 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Belgrade Calculations of bass-reflex enclosures - generally !!! I opened this tread to talk about calculations of Bass-Reflex enclosures. Is there a differencies between results we got with simulations, and the best results for some bass unit in real? If there is differencies, why is that? And how we can correct calculations to got the best in real, without much eksperiments with different enclosure volumes, and tube lenghts for the best Fb.
 7th October 2005, 05:19 PM #2 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Belgrade Example For example. Vifa XG18WH00-08. Data sheet. Nominal impedance [ohm] 8 Voice coil resistance [ohm] 5.7 Sensitivity [dB] 86 Free air resonance [Hz] 34 Voice coil height [mm] 14 Air gap height [mm] 4 Voice coil inductance [mH] 0.53 Eff. diaphragm Area [cm2] 129 Moving mass [g] 11.8 Force factor [Bl] 5.6 VAS [l] 45 Qms 1.77 Qes 0.46 Qts 0.36 Optimized for 8-14 ltr reflex enclosures With simulations we got enclosure Vb=30 L. Vifa recommands BR 8-14 L. I am sure this smaller is better.( and higher Fb then simulated) I try it in many aplications, and it is like that. Higher Qts bigger deviation from calculation. What now? What with simulations ?
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
 From this vent-tuning study is can be seen that calculating the vent dimensions is tricky business. From practical experience I have learned to multiply the vent length by 0.6-0,7 to get the targeted Fb. Quite some deviation from all the nice math. So, no clear recommendation but get help from someone with measuring equipment if you want it right.
Here's the Web site;
http://home1.stofanet.dk/troels.grav...ENT-TUNING.htm

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
 Originally posted by RJ Here's the Web site; http://home1.stofanet.dk/troels.grav...ENT-TUNING.htm
Very nice link. Thank you.

My question was does it can be made corections of standard calculations with T/S parameters to got same (Vb, Fb, Dp, Lp) as its best at the end of eksperiments (and meausurements).

 9th October 2005, 03:18 AM #5 just another diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sydney Blog Entries: 22 Hi Notax, I plugged those values into speaker workshop and tried different alignments and I see what you mean, however I would say it is more likely that they have made an error on the datasheet than that there are errors in the calculations/simulations If the sims are out by a fatcor of 100% there would be a lot of very dissapointed DIY'ers out there I simulated and built a tuned enclosure for a Vifa M26WR-09-08 with a 70L enclosure (recommended between 50L - 100L by Vifa) and it worked out very close to the simulated one. sure you will get some small differences in tuning freq due to not 100% knowing the exact box volume, but these should be minor. Tony. __________________ Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial! Some of my photos
 9th October 2005, 03:32 AM #6 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: California Data sheet parameters show average parameters for drivers, not the parameters of the one driver you have. Parameters change once any power is applied and once the cone moves from rest. Losses in the box and port effect the tuning. How the port is shaped and how it is mounted (what's at the ends) effects the tuning. If you are going to be really picky about your tuning, you need to be more careful with your measurements of driver parameters and your modeling of what you are building. A simple model will probably not be exactly right because it doesn't account for everything that exists in reality.
 9th October 2005, 05:12 AM #7 just another diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sydney Blog Entries: 22 All very true, but with that particular datasheet it says optimised for a 8-14L box which when moddeled seems to give very sub-optimal performance based on the TS params provided...... non-flat and very poor low end extention.... I think iether the params are incorrect or the 8-14L is incorrect either way I think they made a mistake or are trying to appeal to people who want a small box rather than an optimal one Vifa actually has a reputation for having very good driver to driver consistency which match the published specs very well.... others are not so crash hot... but yeah the best way is to measure them yourself! Tony. edit: wooohooo my 1000th post __________________ Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial! Some of my photos
 9th October 2005, 06:06 AM #8 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2004 Also it's important that the drivers are burnt in, parameters can differ significantly from a brand new one. For example, 10 hours with pink noise or a deep sinewave with visible cone excursion could help.
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus

Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Congrats Tony

Quote:
 Originally posted by wintermute wooohooo my 1000th post
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)

 9th October 2005, 09:12 AM #10 just another diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sydney Blog Entries: 22 Thanks Vikash hopefully at least some of them have been usefull Tony. __________________ Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial! Some of my photos

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post paulfk Full Range 7 8th March 2009 11:25 AM drwho Full Range 1 29th October 2007 06:28 PM Jose Hidalgo Subwoofers 23 26th June 2007 07:38 AM kimbo Multi-Way 6 3rd April 2005 09:41 PM Guss Multi-Way 1 15th December 2003 02:33 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 PM.

 Home - Contact Us - Advertise - Rules - diyAudio Store - Sponsors - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top - Opt-out policy

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.