TQWT W4-656S A few questions. - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd October 2002, 06:01 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
Default TQWT W4-656S A few questions.

I am considering building TQWT for a pair of Tang Band W4-656S 4" full range drivers .

They will be mains for a 'Musical Home Theater'--if one could imagine. My GF says I can build tall speakers, as long as they are neat looking. She really likes the look of Martin J. King's ML TQWT's and Andrew Brandon's Zigmahornet (a TL). I however am entertaining the thought of a MTM TQWT with two 656's and a TANG BAND 25-302S

I am asking for help from all the accomplished TL and MTM builders in this forum. I have been reading this forum for about a month and hunting around on the net for TL info. Dave's (a.k.a 'Planet10') T-Line Speakers website is awesome!!

How does one go about altering some of these designs to 'fit' the 656's?

I have read the post about killowatt's project and I am conserned with lobbing. Should I ditch the MTM idea and go for a 2.5 ? or just a 2-way with a sub? There are so many questions...

I am asking for a few answers and maybe some direction... I am very open to any changes...exept the 656's --I already bought them.

Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2002, 06:43 PM   #2
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
Hi Swirv

Where to start...

Firstly, well done for choosing TLs, you won't regret it

I am not familar with the drivers, so I can't help on specifics so I would suggest downloading some of the design programs from Dave's website and having a play with the numbers, if you have any problems with the terminology, etc. then we will be pleased to help.

Don't worry two much about lobing, it only is a real problem with the amount of drivers that Kilo wanted to use , or if you have them spaced widely apart.
If you tuck them closely into the tweeter and choose your crosssover frequencies with care then you will have no problems.

Good luck
__________________
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2002, 07:48 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
Default crossover freq

the issue is that I want to cross the 656's real high...like 6-7khz I do not want any crossover points in the 'musical' freq band. the w4-656 has a freq responce of 65-15k with a spike at 8k
I want to take full advantage of this drivers extended range but want to ad 'air' above 15k all without hitting that nasty spike the 656 has at 8k. Would having two drivers upto 6.5k seperated by a tweeter have lobbing problems. I guess my question here is: at what freq does it really become a problem?

It may not really be an issue.. I really havent made a solid call on the MTM.

Ive been breaking in the 4's using a 3 ft. getto test box (aka cardboard) and they are getting deeper by the day. I can hear the potential of these 'lil 4" drivers. They already go way lower than my modified LX5's I havent measured anything ...point is: the reason I was going to do MTM was to get more cone space for more low-end. I now think I can get away with just one and a tweeter at 6.5k

Like I said before... Im new at this level of design and will take any and all input. And thanks in advance for the help.

Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2002, 11:47 PM   #4
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
Chris, so is that avatar done with Lightwave, the lens flare looks familiar

Lobing only becomes a problem with the drivers more than a quarter wavelength apart at the lowest frequency they reproduce, but it sounds like you are already happy with just one driver per side!

As I said earlier, I don't know the drivers you are using, but by the sound of your experience in running in these drivers, I would go for using one per side with the tweeter in an open baffle dipole, with a QWTL with a decent 8" driver crossing over at about 200 Hz for the bottom end, but then I am strange
__________________
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 12:18 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
I had asked in another thread about open balfle design. I read that a Qts around .5 was desired for a good open baffle setup. The 3" version of this driver is an exelent candidate for an open baffle. however these 4' drivers have an Xmax of 3mm. and a Qts of .35.
I played around with the test enclose by opening the box. The speakers lost any resemblence of bass, closed they pumped out some decient lows. I know I cant expect a lot of bass from these things.. but I do want to take advantae of their willingness to go down to around 80-100Hz. The sub in the setup will be a subwoofer in the sence of HT. 80Hz down as low as I can get without ******* off my neighbors. I would however like to be able to use these without the sub for some musical program. As an engineer I do not like to use a mono sub on music. I have had issues with phase problems in really good stereo mixes when anything is summed. I would only use the sub for HT and maybe to augment the mains when played loudly.

If someone can lend me more knowledge towards an open baffle design that will work with this driver I will throw it into the pot.

... still dont have my mind made up on what type of enclosure for these lil bugers....
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 12:24 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
.. oh and about the lens flare.. It was done with a plugin for Photoshop....
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 12:28 AM   #7
MJK is offline MJK  United States
Account disabled at member's request
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Hello Swirv,

If you want to design a TL or TQWT for your drivers then I would recommend using my MathCad worksheets. You can find older versions at Dave's site (www.t-linespeakers.org) or newer versions at my site (www.quarter-wave.com). Both sites contain links to the free MathCad Explorer Version 8 program for running the calculations.

After you decide which type of speaker enclosure you want to design, you need the T/S parameters of the drivers. Measured values are the best but if all you have is the manufacturer's specification values that will have to do. Running the worksheets is not too difficult but you may need to mess around for a day or so before closing in on an optimized design.

Bottom line is that you need to engineer the enclosure using the MathCad worksheets. This is the most accurate method that I know of available to the DIYer (and it is free, such a deal). Also on my site, you can find a short article on how to model two drivers in a single enclosure in the "General Speaker Related Articles" section. If you are planning to use an MTM alignment you will still need to design a baffle step correction circuit. If you plan on mounting one driver on the front of the enclosure and the second on the back wired in phase then you can neglect this circuit, the driver placement will eliminate the baffle step loss at low frequencies.

Have fun,

Martin J. King
www.quarter-wave.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 03:04 AM   #8
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by swirv
however these 4' drivers have an Xmax of 3mm. and a Qts of .35
With a Q like that a TL like quarter-wave design is probably more appropriate than a voigt.

As to an MTM with 4" drivers, i have been noodling over a bipolar MTM (ie 4x4) with the Foster FE103A. I figured out that 5k was as high as i could take the 4s given how close i could get the drivers -- and this is with the baskets of the 4s actually touching, but rotated and a small footprint tweeter tucked into the v made by the drivers.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 03:44 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
I dont think I have enough data on the driver to use MJK's software. The only data I have is the data given on the TB website. Is there is a way to find the other peramiters required for the software from this data?

link to data

Sorry I'm asking so much... this is my first TL.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2002, 05:38 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
swirv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Carolina
Send a message via AIM to swirv
Default a starting point?

I found a spreadsheet that would give me an example TQWT and I pluged in some numbers from the TB W4-656S data sheet. I took this data an made a CAD drawing of the figures given. I havent pluged this into Martin J King's software yet (still trying to figure it all out... )
This is what I came up with :
Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbe questions TQWT using fostex FE206E LazyJones Full Range 8 30th October 2007 03:27 PM
Basic ML TQWT Questions Shae Full Range 1 8th October 2007 08:14 AM
questions on a FE167 TQWT design. AudioGeek Full Range 13 20th August 2004 11:13 PM
mod Tang Band W4-656S for better venting? capslock Multi-Way 3 8th April 2003 03:07 AM
W4-656s swirv Multi-Way 1 2nd October 2002 01:49 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2