|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
Some people say that sealed = best sound quality
Others say vented designed correctly can almost = sealed when it comes to sound quality. Is there a correlation between port diameter and sound quality - heh Example, would dual 4" diameter ports sound better/worse than a single 6" diameter port when working with a single 15" woofer powered by a 500w - 1000w amplfier ? What would you chose for best SQ. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Well I think that this is a loaded answer. Loaded in the way that a properly vented enclosure can sound very very good. One of the major problems/downfalls with vented enclosures (over sealed) is less power handling. The plus is greater cooling for the voice coil as aposed to the sealed. As far as to which sounds better...well that really depends on your taste. What I personaly like about vented enclosures is the fact of tuning them to a spec. frequency. Does it "sound better" than sealed...in some cases yes. Only if the driver/enclosure is designed and implemented properly. But....sealed enclosures have a very good quaility to themselfs. Especially when used with big power. The only problem, I find is that the sealed enclosure seems to be larger than "normal" in size to get the response I want. So why not build a vented and take advantage of the effieciency.
Ooops, forgot...yes the vent size does matter! Too small and you will get a high Vent Velocity...major noise! Too big, of a port/vent not really, but there is a ratio of Vent to Surface to Cone Coa. just can't remember it right now. Rino Odorico |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In general, maximizing the cross-sectional area of the port will lead to lower airspeed (more laminar airflow in the vent -- less turbulence), and better sound quality. A single 6" vent will give you slightly more cross-sectional area than dual 4" vents, and will be superior as a result (while needing a slightly longer length to achieve the same Fb)
Also, the single 6" vent has the benefit of having far less surface area than the dual 4" ones - reduced surface area leads to less resistive losses in the port, and will result in your driver/box system performing closer to simulations/models in real life. The only real reason to go for dual 4" ports in my opinion is the lack of flared 6" ports for any reasonable price, and perhaps aesthetics, depending on your taste. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
Thanks for the tips. Now it's time to cut some wood
again and see if I can pull the sound quality rabbit out of the hat with ported. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
6" port might also be too long.
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| L-shaped port for vented design | runethechamp | Multi-Way | 3 | 27th May 2009 05:11 AM |
| Vented box design for a Targa Autosound x-150-i | Rooster999 | Subwoofers | 2 | 28th September 2008 04:40 AM |
| Shiva sealed design converted to vented problems | jquin | Subwoofers | 2 | 6th October 2006 03:08 PM |
| vented tube design for small driver | jarrettl | Subwoofers | 3 | 27th February 2006 10:15 PM |
| Flared ports and dual vented / sealed design | Dave Bullet | Multi-Way | 3 | 23rd October 2002 12:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09163 seconds (76.38% PHP - 23.62% MySQL) with 10 queries |